Active Vibration Isolation Using Controllable Rotating Masses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vibration isolation systems for rotating systems, such as helicopter rotor systems, are heavy, increase aerodynamic drag, and require frequent maintenance due to manufacturing imperfections and passive operation, failing to effectively isolate a wide spectrum of vibratory loads and adjust to varying operating conditions.

Innovation Solution

A vibration isolation system with controllable masses driven by independent electric motors and a control system that adjusts rotational speed and position to counteract vibratory loads, minimizing system weight and using lightweight, low-cost materials to reduce drag and maintenance costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If passive vibration isolators are used, then they can suppress vibrations at a predetermined frequency, but they cannot adjust to varying operating conditions and require frequent maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance frequencyVSAvoidadjustability to varying operating conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static, passive vibration isolator into a dynamic, active system by introducing controllable masses that can adjust their rotational speed and position in real-time. The isolator now actively responds to varying vibratory loads across different operating regimes, eliminating the need for frequent maintenance while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system receives input signals indicative of the magnitude and phase of vibratory loads and automatically adjusts the rotational speed and position of the controllable masses to optimize vibration cancellation. This feedback mechanism ensures continuous adaptation to changing operating conditions without manual intervention or maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If traditional vibration isolators are used, then they can provide vibration isolation, but they increase system weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration isolation capabilityVSAvoidsystem weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces heavy traditional mechanical vibration isolators with a lighter active control system using controllable masses driven by electric motors. This substitution maintains vibration isolation capability while significantly reducing system weight by eliminating the need for heavy passive isolation components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs lightweight materials, specifically carbon fiber composite radial arms, to construct the vibration isolator components. This use of composite materials achieves the required structural strength and stiffness while minimizing the overall weight of the vibration isolation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If passive vibration isolators are used, then they can counteract vibrations, but they increase aerodynamic drag

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration counteraction capabilityVSAvoidaerodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses dynamically adjustable controllable masses that can optimize their configuration to minimize aerodynamic drag while maintaining vibration counteraction capability. The system adapts its mass distribution and positioning based on operating conditions, reducing drag compared to fixed passive isolators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the vibration isolation system by using actively controlled masses with variable rotational speed and position, rather than fixed passive components. This allows optimization of both vibration cancellation performance and aerodynamic drag characteristics across different operating regimes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If precision manufacturing is used for passive isolators, then they can achieve exact spring rates, but manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring rate precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the need for precision-manufactured passive spring elements with an active control system using controllable masses and electric motors. This substitution eliminates the requirement for expensive precision manufacturing of springs while achieving equivalent or superior vibration isolation performance through active control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses standard, easily manufactured components such as off-the-shelf electric motors and carbon fiber composite arms, replacing the need for expensive, precision-manufactured passive isolator components. This approach reduces manufacturing costs while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively isolates large amplitude vibrations across a wide spectrum of operating speeds, reducing system weight and maintenance costs while maintaining optimal performance across varying operating regimes.

Implementation Method 1

driven by independent electric motors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The isolation system employs two, essentially coplanar, masses that are (i) disposed at a predetermined distance from the axis of rotation of the rotating system, and (ii) driven in the same or opposing rotational direction as the rotating system at a rotational speed at least 3P greater than the rotational speed of the rotating system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS9046148B2Active force generation system for minimizing vibration in a rotating system
Publication Date: 2015.06.02 SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORP
  • US9046148B2 patent drawing
  • US9046148B2 patent drawing
  • US9046148B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and device for reducing vibratory noise in a system with an integral rotating member includes independently operable drive systems for controlling the angular velocity of at least two independently rotatable masses. Control signals manipulate the drive system to rotate each mass at optimal speed, direction and phase to reduce noise induced in the system by the rotating member.