Activity-Based Collateral Modeling for Cross-Asset Visibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Institutional clients face challenges in monitoring key metrics across different financial products and systems, leading to inefficiencies and delayed decisions due to cross-system opacity and disparate software usage.

Innovation Solution

An activity-based collateral modeling system that integrates analytical, decision-making, and execution modules across a value chain using a real-time feedback loop, enabling cross-asset utilization optimization and solving inefficiencies through a customizable platform.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If different software systems are used for different financial products and services, then functional specialization is achieved, but cross-system visibility and monitoring capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional specializationVSAvoidcross-system visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a central modeling system that acts as an intermediary between disparate financial systems. This system receives data from multiple source systems (securities lending, repo, swaps), normalizes it through a common data model, and provides unified visibility. The intermediary resolves the contradiction by enabling specialized systems to maintain their functional independence while aggregating information centrally for comprehensive monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The modeling system is designed as a universal platform that handles multiple financial product types and serves multiple user groups (risk, treasury, trading desk, portfolio management). By building a single system that performs multiple functions - data aggregation, normalization, analysis, and visualization - the patent eliminates the need for separate specialized systems for each function, thereby resolving the visibility problem without sacrificing functional capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If separate systems are used for different departments, then departmental specialization is maintained, but decision-making efficiency and timeliness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepartmental specializationVSAvoiddecision-making efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback mechanisms where departmental data is continuously aggregated, analyzed, and presented to users. The modeling system processes transactions as they occur and provides immediate visibility into cross-departmental impacts. This feedback loop enables departments to make informed decisions quickly while maintaining their specialized functions, directly improving decision-making efficiency without sacrificing departmental autonomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the system into modular components that can serve different departments independently while maintaining overall integration. Each department can access relevant data and tools through the unified platform without requiring system-wide changes. This segmentation allows departmental specialization to persist while enabling efficient cross-departmental decision-making through shared access to normalized data and real-time analytics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual processes are used for portfolio analysis, then flexibility and customization are maintained, but analysis speed and real-time capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility and customizationVSAvoidanalysis speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining data models, normalization rules, and analysis frameworks that can be quickly adapted to different scenarios. Users can configure specific parameters and criteria without reconstructing the entire analysis system. This preliminary setup enables rapid execution of customized analyses while maintaining flexibility, as the foundation is already in place and only specific parameters need adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables analysis speed and flexibility through parameter-based customization. Instead of requiring system reconfiguration for different analyses, users can adjust parameters such as time horizons, risk thresholds, allocation criteria, and reporting formats. The system maintains the same underlying architecture and data models while adapting outputs through parameter changes, thereby achieving both real-time capability and customization without manual process reconstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11620712B2Activity-based collateral modeling
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 FINOPTSYS INC
  • US11620712B2 patent drawing
  • US11620712B2 patent drawing
  • US11620712B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for performing activity-based collateral modeling (ABCM) analysis are disclosed, including: obtaining portfolio data; obtaining multiple ranked criteria for cross-asset utilization; performing an ABCM analysis on the portfolio data according to the ranked criteria for cross-asset utilization, to obtain a set of one or more recommended transactions; receiving user input indicating a decision to execute a transaction in the set of one or more recommended transactions; and responsive to the user input, updating the ABCM analysis to reflect the decision to execute the transaction.