Multi-User Lighting Control via Activity-Based Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current lighting control systems fail to adequately address the diverse lighting preferences of multiple users in a room, particularly varying based on activity, and often prioritize one user's preferences over others.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a processor, communication interface, and storage that identifies users and their activities to adjust light output from multiple light output apparatuses based on individual lighting preferences, using data tables and algorithms to transmit commands for customized lighting settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If current lighting control systems adjust light based on one user's preference, then that user's lighting preference is satisfied, but other users' lighting preferences are not addressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelighting preference accommodationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the lighting control into multiple independent zones, each with its own light output apparatus controlled by a specific user. The system segments the user base into individual users with distinct preferences and locations, allowing each user to independently control their designated lighting zone without affecting others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by allowing different lighting characteristics (intensity, color temperature, timing) in different spatial zones corresponding to different users. Each user's lighting environment is customized to their local preferences and activity needs, creating heterogeneous lighting conditions across the shared space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If lighting control systems use simple on/off or dimming control, then the system is easy to operate, but it cannot address varying lighting preferences based on activity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity-based lighting adjustmentVSAvoidcontrol system usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects user activity states and adjusts lighting parameters without requiring manual user input. Sensors and processors monitor user presence, activity type, and environmental conditions, then autonomously configure appropriate lighting settings based on pre-programmed preferences and activity profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The lighting control system transitions from static on/off or simple dimming to dynamic, multi-parameter control that continuously adapts to changing user activities. The system adjusts multiple lighting attributes (intensity, color temperature, timing) in real-time based on detected activity states, creating a responsive and adaptive lighting environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple light output apparatuses are controlled independently for each user, then individual lighting preferences are met, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-user lighting customizationVSAvoidcontrol system architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control system into independent modules, each managing a specific user's lighting preferences and a designated zone's light output apparatus. This modular architecture allows each segment to operate autonomously based on its assigned user's preferences, reducing the complexity burden on the central system while maintaining comprehensive multi-user customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If the system monitors and responds to user activities in real-time, then lighting preferences are accurately addressed, but energy consumption and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic monitoring and sampling of user activities rather than continuous real-time monitoring. Sensors detect user presence and activity states at scheduled intervals, and the lighting system updates settings based on these periodic measurements, reducing energy consumption while maintaining sufficient accuracy for effective lighting control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS10719059B2Systems and methods for control of output from light output apparatus
Publication Date: 2020.07.21 LENOVO SWITZERLAND INTERNATIONAL GMBH
  • US10719059B2 patent drawing
  • US10719059B2 patent drawing
  • US10719059B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one aspect, a device includes a processor, a communication interface accessible to the processor, and storage accessible to the processor. The storage bears instructions executable by the processor to identify an activity associated with a user. The instructions are also executable by the processor to use the communication interface to transmit at least one command to a light output apparatus to adjust light from the light output apparatus based on the identified activity.