Activity-Based Notification Control for Mobile Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current notification systems in portable devices rely on fixed time windows for quiet times, which may not accurately reflect a user's active or inactive state, leading to unnecessary notifications when the user is awake but not using the device.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that senses device activity, such as movement or usage, to determine whether the user is active or inactive, and only generates alerts when the device is deemed active, thereby adjusting notification delivery based on user activity rather than fixed time settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If fixed time windows are used for quiet times, then notification delivery is simple to implement, but notification accuracy in reflecting user active state deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static fixed time windows to dynamic activity-based notification control. The system continuously monitors device activity sensors (accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor) to dynamically determine user presence and adjust notification delivery in real-time, making the notification system adaptive to actual user behavior patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where sensor data about device activity is continuously fed back to the notification manager. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from user behavior patterns and adjust quiet time settings automatically, improving notification accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through iterative adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If activity sensing is implemented to detect user presence, then notification accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser presence detection accuracyVSAvoidsensing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent leverages existing multi-functional sensors already present in modern portable devices for other purposes (motion tracking, step counting, screen proximity detection). By reusing these universal sensors for notification control, the system achieves accurate user presence detection without adding dedicated sensing hardware, thus avoiding increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the device's own existing sensors and processing capabilities to determine user presence and control notifications. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external sensing devices or complex additional hardware, achieving accurate detection while maintaining simplicity by utilizing resources already available in the device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If notifications are suppressed during detected inactive periods, then user disturbance is reduced, but important notifications may be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser disturbanceVSAvoidnotification delivery reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different notification suppression qualities to different notification types and contexts. Critical notifications (alarms, emergency alerts, important messages) are exempted from suppression even during inactive periods, while non-critical notifications are suppressed. This local differentiation maintains reliability for important communications while reducing disturbance for routine notifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial suppression rather than complete blocking of notifications during inactive periods. It selectively suppresses only those notifications determined to be non-urgent based on activity patterns, while allowing critical notifications through. This partial action approach balances disturbance reduction with maintaining reliability for important alerts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9692876B2Suppress and resume notifications based on motion
Publication Date: 2017.06.27 LENOVO SWITZERLAND INTERNATIONAL GMBH
  • US9692876B2 patent drawing
  • US9692876B2 patent drawing
  • US9692876B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach is provided to receive notifications at a device. The approach senses whether an activity, such as movement of the device, has occurred within a time period prior to the current time with the activity being a result of a user action, such as movement or usage, on the device. In response to sensing that an activity has occurred within the time period, an alert is generated at the device to alert the user of the notification. On the other hand, in response to sensing that activity did not occur during the time period, the alert is not generated at the device.