Activity Intensity Determination Using Kinematic Sensor Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for tracking and managing user activity sessions lack accurate determination of intensity levels without a heart rate sensor, especially in varying activity types, and fail to provide user-specific calibration metrics for intensity assessment.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method utilizing a kinematic sensor, user-specific calibration metric, and communication with a server to determine activity type and intensity level, where the calibration metric is obtained through a heart rate data communication process, allowing for intensity estimation based on kinematic sensor data without a heart rate sensor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a heart rate sensor is used to determine intensity level, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintensity level determination accuracyVSAvoidsensor requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses an intermediary calibration model that maps kinematic sensor data to intensity levels through a heart rate-based calibration process. The server acts as an intermediary that receives heart rate data during calibration sessions, processes it along with kinematic data, and generates a personalized mapping model. This model then enables intensity determination using only kinematic sensors during actual activity sessions, eliminating the need for continuous heart rate monitoring while maintaining accuracy through the pre-established relationship between kinematic patterns and heart rate responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If user-specific calibration is implemented, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to calibration procedure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser-specific intensity assessment accuracyVSAvoidcalibration procedure duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration process is performed in advance during dedicated calibration sessions before regular activity monitoring begins. The system collects heart rate and kinematic sensor data during these preliminary sessions to establish the user-specific mapping model. Once calibrated, the system can accurately determine intensity levels during subsequent activity sessions without requiring additional calibration time, as the mapping model is already established and stored for reuse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If activity type identification is added to intensity determination, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity type coverageVSAvoidprocessing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal calibration model that works across multiple activity types by establishing separate mapping models for different activity categories (e.g., running, cycling, swimming). The system identifies the current activity type and selects the appropriate pre-calibrated model for intensity determination. This approach allows the same core processing architecture to handle diverse activities without requiring activity-specific hardware or complex processing, as each activity type has its own validated mapping model that can be independently applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10856776B2Activity intensity level determination
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 SUUNTO OY
  • US10856776B2 patent drawing
  • US10856776B2 patent drawing
  • US10856776B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an example aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus comprising memory configured to store a user-specific calibration metric, and at least one processing core, configured to determine an activity type identifier of an activity a user is engaged in, and to determine a user-specific intensity level of the activity, wherein determining the user-specific intensity level is based at least partly on the identifier of the activity type, the user-specific calibration metric and data obtained from a kinematic or speed sensor, and to obtain the user-specific calibration metric by causing the apparatus to participate in a calibration procedure, the calibration procedure including communicating heart rate data of the user with a server.