Activity Intensity Determination Using Kinematic Sensor Calibration
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing systems for tracking and managing user activity sessions lack accurate determination of intensity levels without a heart rate sensor, especially in varying activity types, and fail to provide user-specific calibration metrics for intensity assessment.
Innovation Solution
An apparatus and method utilizing a kinematic sensor, user-specific calibration metric, and communication with a server to determine activity type and intensity level, where the calibration metric is obtained through a heart rate data communication process, allowing for intensity estimation based on kinematic sensor data without a heart rate sensor.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If a heart rate sensor is used to determine intensity level, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent uses an intermediary calibration model that maps kinematic sensor data to intensity levels through a heart rate-based calibration process. The server acts as an intermediary that receives heart rate data during calibration sessions, processes it along with kinematic data, and generates a personalized mapping model. This model then enables intensity determination using only kinematic sensors during actual activity sessions, eliminating the need for continuous heart rate monitoring while maintaining accuracy through the pre-established relationship between kinematic patterns and heart rate responses.
2Measurement precision
If user-specific calibration is implemented, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to calibration procedure
Solution Approach 1:
The calibration process is performed in advance during dedicated calibration sessions before regular activity monitoring begins. The system collects heart rate and kinematic sensor data during these preliminary sessions to establish the user-specific mapping model. Once calibrated, the system can accurately determine intensity levels during subsequent activity sessions without requiring additional calibration time, as the mapping model is already established and stored for reuse.
3Adaptability or versatility
If activity type identification is added to intensity determination, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent creates a universal calibration model that works across multiple activity types by establishing separate mapping models for different activity categories (e.g., running, cycling, swimming). The system identifies the current activity type and selects the appropriate pre-calibrated model for intensity determination. This approach allows the same core processing architecture to handle diverse activities without requiring activity-specific hardware or complex processing, as each activity type has its own validated mapping model that can be independently applied.
Data Source
AI summary
According to an example aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus comprising memory configured to store a user-specific calibration metric, and at least one processing core, configured to determine an activity type identifier of an activity a user is engaged in, and to determine a user-specific intensity level of the activity, wherein determining the user-specific intensity level is based at least partly on the identifier of the activity type, the user-specific calibration metric and data obtained from a kinematic or speed sensor, and to obtain the user-specific calibration metric by causing the apparatus to participate in a calibration procedure, the calibration procedure including communicating heart rate data of the user with a server.


