Activity Map Machine Learning for Anomalous Behavior Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to effectively detect and respond to anomalous behavior in monitored physical environments, such as construction, manufacturing, or fulfillment centers, using conventional methods.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based approach that utilizes activity maps generated from sensor data to identify anomalous behavior by applying these maps to a trained model, followed by automated actions to mitigate such behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional detection methods are used, then system complexity is reduced, but detection accuracy and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical/deterministic detection systems with a machine learning-based system that uses neural networks to analyze activity maps. This substitution enables the system to learn complex patterns from data and improve detection accuracy automatically, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where detected anomalies are fed back into the machine learning model for continuous training and improvement. This feedback loop allows the system to progressively improve its detection accuracy while managing complexity through automated learning rather than manual system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If machine learning models are applied to detect anomalous behavior, then detection accuracy improves, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing by pre-computing and storing activity maps from sensor data before feeding them into the machine learning model. This preliminary action reduces the computational burden during real-time anomaly detection, as the model only needs to analyze the pre-processed activity maps rather than raw sensor data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the detection process into distinct stages: sensor data collection, activity map generation, and anomaly detection using machine learning models. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing overall computational energy requirements while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Speed

If real-time monitoring is implemented, then response time to anomalies improves, but data processing volume and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and processes only the essential information from sensor data by generating activity maps that summarize object behavior patterns. This extraction approach reduces the data volume that needs to be stored and processed in real-time while maintaining the ability to detect anomalies quickly, thus improving response time without proportionally increasing data handling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250252294A1Machine learning-based detection of anomalous object behavior in a monitored physical environment
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 DELL PROD LP
  • US20250252294A1 patent drawing
  • US20250252294A1 patent drawing
  • US20250252294A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are provided for machine learning-based detection of anomalous object behavior in a monitored physical environment. One method includes obtaining activity maps comprising data characterizing objects of a respective object type within a monitored physical environment; applying the activity maps to a machine learning model trained to generate one or more predicted activity maps; comparing the one or more predicted activity maps to corresponding activity maps; and, in response to a result of the comparison indicating anomalous object behavior, initiating at least one automated action. A given activity map may comprise multiple cells, wherein a given cell is mapped to a corresponding portion of the monitored physical environment. The given activity map may correspond to a particular object type and the given cell may comprise aggregated data characterizing objects of the particular object type in the given cell.