Data-Driven Activity Prediction With Sensor Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing activity prediction techniques in smart environments face challenges due to noisy sensor data and errors in activity labeling, which affect the accuracy of predicting future activity times, especially when considering spatial and temporal relationships.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of data-driven activity prediction techniques that utilize activity-labeled sensor events to learn an individual's routine, employing both independent and recurrent activity predictors to generate predictions for future activity occurrence times, and integrating these predictions into an activity prompting application to facilitate facility automation and user intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing activity prediction techniques are used, then activity prediction can be implemented, but prediction accuracy deteriorates due to noisy sensor data and labeling errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity prediction accuracyVSAvoidsensor data quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where predicted activities are compared with actual sensor data and user corrections. The activity prediction module continuously refines its predictions based on feedback from activity recognition results and user corrections, improving accuracy over time despite noisy input data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an activity recognition module as an intermediary between raw sensor data and activity predictions. This intermediary processes and labels sensor events before they reach the prediction module, filtering out some noise and providing structured input that improves prediction reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If manual input of user schedules is required, then activity prompting can be implemented, but system complexity and user burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity prompting setupVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically learns user activity patterns and schedules from sensor data without requiring manual input. The activity prediction module autonomously generates prompting schedules by analyzing historical sensor events and recognized activities, eliminating the need for users to manually configure their daily routines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of sensor data to pre-establish activity patterns and schedules before prompting is needed. By continuously learning from incoming sensor events, the system prepares prediction models in advance, so when prompting is required, accurate predictions are already available without requiring user configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11551103B2Data-driven activity prediction
Publication Date: 2023.01.10 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY
  • US11551103B2 patent drawing
  • US11551103B2 patent drawing
  • US11551103B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A physical environment is equipped with a plurality of sensors (e.g., motion sensors). As individuals perform various activities within the physical environment, sensor readings are received from one or more of the sensors. Based on the sensor readings, activities being performed by the individuals are recognized and the sensor data is labeled based on the recognized activities. Future activity occurrences are predicted based on the labeled sensor data. Activity prompts may be generated and/or facility automation may be performed for one or more future activity occurrences.