Activity Parameter Estimation via Context-Aware Sensor Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic devices struggle to optimally track all aspects of an activity due to fixed parameter-determining approaches and the need for dedicated devices, lacking flexibility in selecting sensor modalities based on context and parameter-specific requirements.

Innovation Solution

A context-dependent technique for dynamically selecting sensor modalities, such as smartphones and smartwatches, to estimate activity parameters like running cadence and vertical oscillation, using a combination of device availability, context, and model selection to enhance estimation accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple dedicated devices are used to track all activity parameters, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and user burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity parameter estimation accuracyVSAvoidnumber of devices required
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables a single electronic device to perform multiple activity parameter estimation functions by dynamically selecting from multiple sensor modalities (accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, barometer, GPS, camera, microphone) and multiple estimation models. This multi-functional approach allows one device to replace what would traditionally require multiple dedicated devices, achieving comprehensive activity tracking without increasing device count.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects which sensor modalities and estimation models to use based on current activity context, available sensors, and parameter-specific requirements. This dynamic adaptation allows the device to optimize its sensor usage in real-time, improving measurement precision for each specific parameter while avoiding the need to continuously activate all sensors, thereby managing device complexity efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If sensor modalities are dynamically selected based on context and parameter requirements, then measurement precision is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter estimation accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of the current activity context (e.g., running, walking, cycling) and pre-identifies which sensor modalities and estimation models are most suitable for each parameter type. By pre organizing the available sensors and models into context-specific configurations, the system reduces the real-time computational burden while maintaining high estimation accuracy through context-appropriate model selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (which sensors are active, which models are applied) based on the detected activity context and the specific parameter being estimated. This parameter adaptation allows the system to use simpler models for less critical parameters and reserve more computationally intensive models for parameters requiring higher precision, thereby balancing accuracy with computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If dedicated devices are used for specific parameters, then measurement precision is improved, but adaptability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter tracking accuracyVSAvoidflexibility in device selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms dedicated parameter-tracking functionality into a universal capability available across all activity types. By implementing a framework that supports multiple sensor modalities and estimation models within a single device, the system can adapt to different activities (running, walking, cycling, swimming) and estimate various parameters (cadence, speed, distance, elevation) using the most appropriate sensors and models for each context, thereby achieving both precision and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts its sensor and model selection based on the detected activity type and the specific parameters being tracked. This dynamic flexibility allows the same device to optimize its configuration for different activities and parameters, replacing the need for dedicated devices while maintaining high measurement precision through context-appropriate sensor and model selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260000318A1Multi-Modal Activity Parameter Estimation
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20260000318A1 patent drawing
  • US20260000318A1 patent drawing
  • US20260000318A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a method includes determining a set of one or more step-based activity parameters to estimate for a current activity of a user; and determining current parameter-estimation inputs including (1) a current activity context and (2) a current status of each of a number of sensor modalities. The method further includes selecting, for each of the one or more step-based activity parameters and based on the current parameter-estimation inputs, a respective set of one or more sensor modalities from the number of sensor modalities to use to estimate that step-based activity parameter of the current activity of the user; and for each of the one or more step-based activity parameters, estimating that activity parameter using current data from the respective selected set of one or more sensor modalities.