Activity Tracker Alarm Auto-Deactivation via Motion Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fitness trackers provide complex and confusing interfaces for users to view and manage activity data, and existing alarm systems on activity tracking devices do not effectively account for user activity levels or allow for intuitive gesture-based control.

Innovation Solution

The system configures alarm settings on activity tracking devices using remote computing devices and allows users to transition alarms into snooze or off modes via contact gestures, automatically deactivating alarms based on detected activity levels or physical contact, such as taps on the device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If alarm systems on activity tracking devices provide basic alarm functionality, then the device can trigger alarms at set times, but the interface for managing alarm settings becomes complex and confusing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm functionalityVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm system automatically adjusts its behavior based on detected activity levels without requiring manual user configuration. The device self-manages alarm deactivation by monitoring activity data and comparing it against predefined thresholds, eliminating the need for complex user interfaces to manage alarm settings and behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the alarm based on detected activity levels. When activity exceeds a threshold, the alarm automatically deactivates or transitions to snooze mode, dynamically adjusting alarm behavior based on real-time physiological data rather than requiring fixed user-configured settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the alarm system requires manual user interaction to deactivate, then the alarm can be precisely controlled, but the user experience becomes cumbersome during active periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm controlVSAvoiduser interaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm system continuously monitors activity data from sensors and uses this feedback to automatically adjust alarm state. The system detects when the user becomes active through motion sensors or step counters and automatically deactivates the alarm or transitions to snooze mode, creating a closed-loop control system that responds to user state without requiring manual input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical interaction (button presses, switches) with automatic sensor-based detection and control. Activity sensors detect user movement and physiological state, substituting the need for manual alarm deactivation with automated sensor-driven control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the device provides comprehensive activity tracking capabilities, then it can monitor multiple activity metrics, but the interface for viewing and managing data becomes complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity trackingVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The activity tracking device integrates multiple sensing capabilities (motion detection, step counting, activity recognition) into a single unified system that serves both fitness tracking and alarm control functions. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be separate complex interfaces into one integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the alarm control interface with the activity tracking interface, combining two potentially separate complex interfaces into one unified interaction model. Users manage both alarm settings and activity tracking through the same interface paradigm, reducing overall interface complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides a user-friendly interface for managing alarm settings and activity tracking, allowing users to easily manage alarms based on their activity levels and preferences, enhancing the usability and effectiveness of fitness tracking devices.

Implementation Method 1

The alarm produces a vibration of the device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS9646481B2Alarm setting and interfacing with gesture contact interfacing controls
Publication Date: 2017.05.09 FITBIT INC
  • US9646481B2 patent drawing
  • US9646481B2 patent drawing
  • US9646481B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device configured for capture of activity data for a user includes a housing, a sensor, a motor, a memory, and a processor. The sensor is disposed in the housing to track activity data of the user. The motor causes vibration of the housing. The memory stores an alarm setting that defines a time of day for triggering an alarm on the device. The processor activates the alarm upon reaching the time of day defined by the alarm setting, with the alarm causing the motor to produce the vibration of the housing. The sensor, which is interfaced with the processor, is configured to detect a current level of activity of the user. The processor is configured to automatically deactivate the alarm if the current level of activity qualifies for deactivating the alarm. The deactivating of the alarm causes the vibration of the device to be suspended.