Activity Tracking via Physiological and Location Data Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wearable devices for activity tracking often inaccurately detect and record physical activities due to reliance on user confirmation and limited use of location data, leading to incomplete or incorrect activity logs.

Innovation Solution

The system utilizes both physiological data from wearable devices and location information to accurately identify and record physical activity segments, including start and stop times, parameters such as speed and distance, and automatically detects activity completion without user input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional activity tracking relies on user confirmation to detect physical activity, then the device can identify activity types, but the activity tracking accuracy deteriorates because activities occurring before user confirmation are omitted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity detection accuracyVSAvoidactivity recording completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically detecting and recording physical activity segments based on physiological and location data before user confirmation is received. The processor identifies activity start and end times, calculates activity parameters, and stores activity logs proactively without waiting for user input, thereby capturing complete activity information including periods that would otherwise be omitted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If the system prompts users to confirm activity completion, then user feedback can be obtained, but the activity tracking reliability deteriorates because activities are incorrectly included after completion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interactionVSAvoidactivity tracking reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by monitoring physiological data and location information in real-time to automatically detect activity completion based on predefined criteria. When the processor determines that activity parameters fall below thresholds or location changes indicate cessation, the system automatically marks activity completion and stops tracking, providing continuous feedback-based adjustment without relying on user prompts that may cause delays or errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by autonomously detecting, recording, and managing activity segments without requiring user confirmation or intervention. The processor independently analyzes physiological and location data, identifies activity boundaries, calculates parameters, and maintains activity logs automatically, enabling the device to manage its own activity tracking functions reliably without human input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If only physiological data is used for activity detection, then the system can identify activity segments, but the measurement precision deteriorates due to inability to accurately determine activity parameters such as speed and distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity detection capabilityVSAvoidactivity parameter accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges physiological data from sensors with location data from GPS or other positioning systems to comprehensively detect and characterize physical activity. The processor integrates heart rate, motion, and location information to simultaneously identify activity segments and calculate accurate parameters including speed, distance, route, and elevation, achieving both detection capability and measurement precision through data fusion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If manual user confirmation is required for activity tracking, then the device can verify activity occurrence, but the extent of automation deteriorates due to dependence on user input

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity verificationVSAvoidactivity tracking automation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves self-service by implementing automatic activity detection and recording functionality that operates independently of user input. The processor continuously monitors physiological and location data, autonomously identifies activity segments based on detected patterns, calculates activity parameters, and maintains logs without requiring user confirmation or interaction, thereby maximizing automation while maintaining reliability through sensor-based verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12254971B2Location-based activity tracking
Publication Date: 2025.03.18 OURA HEALTH OY
  • US12254971B2 patent drawing
  • US12254971B2 patent drawing
  • US12254971B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for activity tracking are described. A method for automatic activity detection may include receiving physiological data associated with a user from a wearable device and identifying an activity segment during which the user is engaged in a physical activity based on the physiological data. The method may further include identifying location data associated with the user for at least a portion of the activity segment and identifying one or more parameters associated with the physical activity based on the physiological data and the location data. The method may further include causing a user device to display the one or more parameters associated with the physical activity.