Actuated Flow Control Valve for Filtration Fouling Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Filtration systems, such as hydroclones, face fouling issues due to particulates impinging on filter media, leading to reduced capacity and downtime, as existing methods rely on sacrificing filtration capacity to prevent fouling by setting pressure differential set points below the fouling threshold, which is not instantaneous enough to react to spikes.

Innovation Solution

A filtration system employing an actuated flow control valve that automatically regulates pressure differential and flow rate, maintaining these parameters within set points to prevent fouling while maximizing filtration capacity, using a pressure differential sensor and flow meter to control the actuated flow control valve, allowing for dynamic adjustments to maintain optimal operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the pressure differential set point is set below the fouling threshold to prevent filter media fouling, then filter media fouling is reduced, but filtration capacity is sacrificed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter media fouling preventionVSAvoidfiltration capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the pressure differential set point based on real-time conditions rather than using a fixed conservative value. The actuated flow control valve responds to actual pressure differential measurements, allowing the system to operate at higher capacities when conditions permit while still preventing fouling when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback monitoring of the pressure differential across the filter media. This feedback loop enables the control system to detect approaching fouling conditions and adjust the flow control valve accordingly, allowing operation closer to the fouling threshold without actually causing fouling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the pressure differential set point is set close to the fouling threshold to maximize filtration capacity, then filtration capacity is increased, but the system cannot react instantaneously to spikes causing fouling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration capacityVSAvoidresponse time to pressure spikes
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses continuous feedback monitoring of pressure differential to detect spikes immediately when they occur. This real-time monitoring enables the control system to respond instantly to pressure variations, adjusting the flow control valve to prevent fouling even when operating close to the fouling threshold.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual or mechanical pressure regulation with an automated actuated flow control valve controlled by electronic sensors and a control algorithm. This substitution enables much faster response times to pressure spikes compared to traditional mechanical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If the effluent valve is closed and drain valve is opened to reduce pressure differential, then filter media fouling is prevented, but system downtime increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter media fouling preventionVSAvoidsystem downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous filtration operation by using the actuated flow control valve to manage pressure differential dynamically. This eliminates the need to close the effluent valve and open the drain valve, allowing uninterrupted filtration while still preventing fouling through controlled pressure management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own flow control mechanisms to prevent fouling rather than requiring external intervention through drain valve operation. The actuated valve self-regulates the pressure differential to keep the system in a safe operating range, eliminating the need for periodic draining and cleaning cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively increases filtration capacity by preventing fouling and minimizing downtime, allowing for continuous operation without sacrificing filtration efficiency, as it automatically adjusts to maintain set points and purge particulates, thus extending the filter media's lifespan.

Implementation Method 1

pressure differential sensor to detect a pressure differential between an area inside the filter media and an area outside the filter media

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

actuated flow control valve in communication with the pressure differential sensor and arranged to regulate a flow rate of the filtered medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow rate control: Valve

Implementation Method 3

circulation pump arranged to move the unfiltered medium through the filter media

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPumping: Pump

Implementation Method 4

A spinning flow pattern is developed within the hydroclone so that heavier solids within the feedwater are moved by centrifugal force to the inside wall of the hydroclone for removal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS10610873B2Filtration system utilizing actuated flow control valve
Publication Date: 2020.04.07 LALLI JASON D
  • US10610873B2 patent drawing
  • US10610873B2 patent drawing
  • US10610873B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A filtration system with a filter out of which filtered medium exits are provided. The system includes a control panel that receives pressure and flow rate information of the medium and uses the pressure information to send a first signal to prevent a pressure differential of the medium from exceeding a first set point yet maintain filtration of the medium. The control panel uses the flow rate information to send a second signal to prevent the flow rate of the medium from exceeding a second set point yet maintain filtration of the medium. An actuated flow control valve is present that opens at different amounts, and the medium flows through the actuated flow control valve.