Aircraft Actuator Backup Control Architecture Against Common-Mode Failure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft actuation and propulsion engine control systems face challenges in mitigating common mode failures due to design and manufacturing errors in complex electronic hardware, leading to potential catastrophic results when multiple controllers are deactivated simultaneously.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a command monitor backup control architecture that includes a first and second command module with different electronic configurations and a monitor module, allowing the actuator to be controlled using the second control signal when the first command module is deactivated or malfunctioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional command/monitor module pairs are used with identical electronic configurations, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but common mode failures can deactivate all controllers simultaneously leading to catastrophic results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidelectronic configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by configuring the first and second command modules with different electronic configurations. This asymmetric design ensures that a common mode failure affecting one configuration will not necessarily affect the other, thereby preventing simultaneous deactivation of all controllers and improving system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the control system into multiple independent command modules (first and second command modules) with distinct electronic configurations. This segmentation isolates potential failures to specific modules, allowing other segments to continue operating and maintaining overall system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If multiple controllers with identical configurations are used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but the loss of actuation functionality increases when common mode failures occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller manufacturingVSAvoidactuation functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements asymmetry in the electronic configurations of parallel command modules. While this increases manufacturing complexity compared to identical modules, it ensures that common mode failures cannot simultaneously disable all controllers, thereby preserving actuation functionality and improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the electronic configuration parameters of the command modules to be different from each other. This parameter differentiation ensures that failures affecting one configuration do not propagate to others, maintaining system functionality despite the increased manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If backup command modules with different electronic configurations are implemented, then system reliability is improved against common mode failures, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller backup reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control system into multiple independent command modules with different electronic configurations. This segmentation creates functional redundancy where failure of one module does not compromise the entire system, improving backup reliability while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-configuring multiple command modules with different electronic configurations before operation. This preparatory measure ensures that if one module fails, another is already in place and configured to take over, improving reliability without requiring complex real-time reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250138559A1Command monitor backup control architecture
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 WISK AERO LLC
  • US20250138559A1 patent drawing
  • US20250138559A1 patent drawing
  • US20250138559A1 patent drawing

AI summary

System, methods, and machine-readable media may facilitate control of an aircraft. An actuator may be controlled based on the following. A first control signal may be output, with a first command module, to control the actuator. The first command module may include a first electronic configuration. Commands generated by the first command module and/or system response signals may be monitored with a monitor module. The monitor module may include a third electronic configuration that is different from the first electronic configuration. A second control signal may be output, with a second command module, to control the actuator when the first command module is deactivated or malfunctioning. The second command module may include a second electronic configuration that is different from the first electronic configuration and the third electronic configuration. The actuator may be controlled using the second control signal when the first command module is deactivated or malfunctioning.