Actuator Flow Control Circuit With Bypass Valve for Asymmetric Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional flow control systems for actuators, such as hydraulic or pneumatic cylinders, face challenges with asymmetric flow capacities, leading to the use of large and heavy valves, low utilization of flow paths, and flow instabilities.

Innovation Solution

A flow control circuit with a fluid bypass path and a controllable bypass valve allows for higher flow rates through one port without requiring a flow control valve assembly rated for those high flow rates, enabling the use of more compact and lightweight valves and improving flow stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If proportional directional valves are rated for the largest flow rates to handle asymmetric flow requirements, then the flow capacity is sufficient, but the valves become large, heavy, and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate capacityVSAvoidvalve weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The flow control system is segmented into two parallel paths: a main flow path through the proportional directional valve and a bypass path with a separate bypass valve. This allows the main valve to be sized for lower flow rates while the bypass valve handles the remaining flow, reducing the size and weight of the main control valve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bypass valve acts as an intermediary element that diverts excess flow around the main proportional directional valve. By introducing this intermediate flow path, the system can achieve high flow capacity without requiring the main valve to be oversized, thus reducing its weight and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Quantity of substance

If proportional directional valves are rated for the largest flow rates to handle asymmetric flow requirements, then the flow capacity is sufficient, but the cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate capacityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The flow control system is segmented into two parallel paths: a main flow path through the proportional directional valve and a bypass path with a separate bypass valve. This allows the main valve to be sized for lower flow rates while the bypass valve handles the remaining flow, reducing the size and weight of the main control valve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bypass valve acts as an intermediary element that diverts excess flow around the main proportional directional valve. By introducing this intermediate flow path, the system can achieve high flow capacity without requiring the main valve to be oversized, thus reducing its weight and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If the spool opening is kept small to achieve required small flow rates, then flow control precision is maintained, but flow instabilities occur due to large pressure drop

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control precisionVSAvoidflow stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The flow control system is segmented into two parallel paths: a main flow path through the proportional directional valve and a bypass path with a separate bypass valve. This allows the main valve to be sized for lower flow rates while the bypass valve handles the remaining flow, reducing the size and weight of the main control valve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a small spool opening that creates instability, the system uses partial action by opening the bypass valve to provide an alternative flow path. This allows the main valve to operate in a stable region while the bypass valve handles the excess flow, achieving both precision and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Quantity of substance

If conventional valves are used for asymmetric flow control, then the system can handle the flow requirements, but the utilization of flow paths is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rateVSAvoidflow path utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow control system is segmented into two parallel paths: a main flow path through the proportional directional valve and a bypass path with a separate bypass valve. This allows the main valve to be sized for lower flow rates while the bypass valve handles the remaining flow, reducing the size and weight of the main control valve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bypass valve is designed to be controllable (electric or fluidic), allowing it to dynamically adjust based on system requirements. This multi-functionality enables the bypass path to serve both as a flow augmentation path and as a means to improve overall system efficiency and response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed solution allows for increased flow rates through one port while reducing the size and weight of the flow control valve assembly, improving controllability and reducing flow instabilities, thereby achieving a more compact and efficient flow control system.

Implementation Method 1

The bypass valve is controllable so as to open or close the bypass valve to allow or block the flow of fluid through the fluid bypass path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectValve control: Valve

Implementation Method 2

The flow control valve assembly comprises one or more valves configured to provide a flow of pressurized fluid from a pressurized fluid source to one of the first and second ports along a fluid supply path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow control: Valve

Implementation Method 3

The flow control valve assembly is further configured to provide a flow of fluid from the other of the first and second ports to a fluid sink along a fluid return path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow control: Valve

Implementation Method 4

The bypass path comprises a flow rate control element configured to control a flow rate in the bypass path so as to keep the flow rate in the bypass path constant independent of the load conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow rate control: Valve

Data Source

PatentEP3699437B1Flow control for an actuator
Publication Date: 2025.05.21 SIEMENS GAMESA RENEWABLE ENERGY AS
  • EP3699437B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3699437B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3699437B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A flow control circuit for an actuator is provided. The actuator comprises a first chamber (111) and a second chamber (112), wherein the first chamber experiences a volume change that is larger than a volume change experienced by the second chamber upon actuation of the actuator (110). The flow control circuit (10) comprises a first port (11) configured to be connected to the first chamber (111), a second port (12) configured to be connected to the second chamber (112), and a flow control valve assembly (20) comprising one or more valves configured to provide a flow of pressurized fluid from a pressurized fluid source (41) to one of the first and second ports (11, 12) along a fluid supply path and further configured to provide a flow of fluid from the other of the first and second ports (11, 12) to a fluid sink (42) along a fluid return path. The flow control circuit (10) further comprises a fluid bypass path (30) comprising a bypass valve (31) .