Electric Lock Actuator with Counter-Spindle for Manipulation Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electric actuators for locks with rotary-to-linear motion conversion mechanisms are prone to manipulation attempts involving torque or angular momentum pulses, leading to potential spindle drive manipulation due to relative rotary movement between the spindle and housing.

Innovation Solution

The electric actuator design features a drive sub-unit and a driven sub-unit with rotation axes that are parallel but offset, with matched moments of inertia to compensate for rotation caused by torque pulses, and includes a coil spring with variable pitch and a bias mechanism to enhance safety against mechanical manipulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If a spindle drive or rotary-to-linear motion conversion mechanism is used in an electric actuator, then the construction becomes compact, but the actuator becomes vulnerable to manipulation attempts involving torque pulses that cause relative rotary movement between the spindle and housing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator sizeVSAvoidsafety against manipulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a counter-spindle that rotates in the opposite direction to the main spindle when torque pulses are applied. This counter-rotation compensates for and cancels out the unwanted relative movement between the spindle and housing, thereby maintaining safety against manipulation while preserving the compact spindle drive design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetric mass distribution and geometric shaping of the spindle and counter-spindle components. By carefully selecting the mass and geometry of these rotating elements, the system creates controlled rotational inertia that enables the counter-spindle to effectively counteract manipulation torques while maintaining compact dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Volume of moving object

If conventional electric actuators are designed with compact construction using spindle drives, then space is saved, but repeated torque pulses can manipulate the spindle drive due to inertia-induced relative rotary movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator volumeVSAvoidmanipulation vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The counter-spindle acts as a dynamic counterweight that generates opposing rotational momentum to neutralize the effects of repeated torque pulses. This allows the actuator to maintain its compact volume while becoming resistant to manipulation attempts that rely on exploiting inertia-induced relative movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of torque pulse-induced rotation into a beneficial feature by using the same inertial properties to drive the counter-spindle in opposition. The manipulation torques that would normally cause vulnerability are instead harnessed to activate the counter-balancing mechanism, transforming the threat into a protective function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively prevents undesired rotation of the driven shaft during manipulation attempts, ensuring enhanced safety and reliability by canceling out torques and maintaining the lock in a secure position.

Implementation Method 1

The drive sub-unit and the driven sub-unit may have a geometrical shape and mass which are respectively selected such that the driven sub-unit partially or fully compensates a rotation of the drive sub-unit that is caused by a pulse of angular momentum or torque

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoment of inertia: Moment of Inertia

Implementation Method 2

A first moment of inertia of the drive sub-unit and a second moment of inertia of the driven sub-unit may be matched to each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAngular momentum: Angular Momentum

Data Source

PatentEP3636861B1Actuator for an electric lock and method of actuating an electric lock
Publication Date: 2021.08.04 SIMONSVOSS TECH
  • EP3636861B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3636861B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3636861B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

An actuator (20) for an electric lock (1) comprises a stator (14) of an electric motor. The actuator (20) comprises a drive sub-unit which is rotatably mounted. The drive sub-unit comprises a rotor of the electric motor, a drive shaft (22) fixed to the rotor in a torque-proof manner or integral with the rotor, and a drive wheel (23) fixed to the drive shaft (22) in a torque-proof manner. The actuator (20) comprises a driven sub-unit which is rotatably mounted. The driven sub-unit comprises a driven shaft (32) extending parallel to the drive shaft (22), and a driven wheel (33) fixed to the driven shaft (32) in a torque-proof manner, the driven wheel (33) being engaged with the drive wheel (23). The drive sub-unit has a first moment of inertia, I1, and the driven sub-unit has a second moment of inertia, I2, wherein |I1 - I2| / max (I1, I2) is less than 20%.