Actuator Control Device Dual Correction System Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional control devices for actuators, such as those in vehicle transmission oil supplying systems, face reliability issues due to degradation or malfunction of memory and calculation elements, leading to inaccurate correction of current values, resulting in inefficient energy consumption and shift shock during gear changes.

Innovation Solution

A dual correction system is implemented, comprising a control circuit with a first correction unit and a driving circuit with a second correction unit, which corrects detected control amounts and feeds back either correction to regulate the actuator's operating amount, enhancing reliability against memory and element failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single correction unit is used to correct the detected current value, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of the feedback control system deteriorates when memory or calculation elements malfunction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of feedback control systemVSAvoidcomplexity of correction system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing correction units at different locations within the control device - one correction unit in the control circuit and another in the driving circuit. Each correction unit operates independently at its local position to correct the detected current value, ensuring that if one correction unit or its associated memory fails, the other can still maintain correction functionality, thus improving overall system reliability without requiring a completely redundant system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by providing multiple correction units and their associated memory elements in advance. These redundant correction capabilities are prepared beforehand so that when memory deterioration or element malfunction occurs, the system already has backup correction functionality available, preventing complete failure of the feedback control system and maintaining operational reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Measurement precision

If correction coefficients are stored in memory that deteriorates over time, then the initial correction accuracy is achieved, but the long-term reliability and accuracy of current detection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of current detectionVSAvoidlong-term reliability of correction system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by distributing correction functionality across multiple independent correction units, each with its own memory storage for correction coefficients. This spatial distribution ensures that deterioration of memory in one correction unit does not affect the correction capability of other units, maintaining measurement precision and reliability over the long term even as individual memory elements age.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies beforehand cushioning by pre-configuring multiple correction units with backup correction coefficients stored in their respective memories. This redundant setup is prepared in advance to cushion against the inevitable deterioration of memory elements over time, ensuring that the system can continue to provide accurate current detection even after prolonged operation and memory degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If the corrected current value differs significantly from the actual current value due to correction errors, then the feedback control becomes unstable, but this causes energy waste and shift shock

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of feedback controlVSAvoidenergy consumption of linear solenoid
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing independent correction units at different locations in the control system, each capable of independently correcting the detected current value. This distributed correction approach ensures that accurate correction is maintained locally at each stage, preventing significant deviations between corrected and actual current values, thereby maintaining feedback control stability and avoiding the energy waste and shift shock that would result from large correction errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10184558B2Control device and control method for actuator
Publication Date: 2019.01.22 ASTEMO LTD
  • US10184558B2 patent drawing
  • US10184558B2 patent drawing
  • US10184558B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control unit (10) includes a microcontroller (100) that sets a duty ratio corresponding to a target current value of a linear solenoid (7a) and an ASIC (200) that supplies electricity to the linear solenoid (7a) based on the duty ratio. The microcontroller (100) includes a correction unit (110) that corrects a driving current value detected by a current sensor (300). The ASIC (200) includes a correction unit (206) that corrects the driving current value detected by the current sensor (300). A feedback amount selection unit (112) selects either one of the driving current value corrected by the correction unit (110) or the driving current value corrected by the correction unit (206) as a feedback amount corresponding to the target current value. A dual correction system is provided in a feedback control system.