Rotary Actuator Friction Lock for Fail-Fix Position Holding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Actuator assemblies in turbo machines experience undesired movement and operational failures due to loss of input signal or pressure, leading to uncommanded changes in vane angle, which can cause stalls or surges, and existing fail-safe systems are heavy and complex.

Innovation Solution

A rotary actuator assembly with a fail fix system that includes a stop collar or servo piston keyed into a surrounding body, a spring to maintain load, and a friction mechanism to prevent rotation of the output shaft upon loss of signal, using a control valve to balance loads and engage the friction mechanism to mitigate undesired movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fail-safe mechanism is added to prevent undesired movement after actuator failure, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator fail-safe operationVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fail-safe friction mechanism is integrated directly into the actuator assembly, merging the fail-safe function with the existing actuator structure. This eliminates the need for separate external fail-safe components and reduces overall system complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-loaded friction mechanism automatically engages when control pressure is lost, providing self-activating fail-safe protection without requiring external sensors, controllers, or additional actuation systems. The mechanism serves itself by using the loss of control pressure as the triggering condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If a fail-safe mechanism is added to prevent undesired movement after actuator failure, then reliability is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator fail-safe operationVSAvoidactuator assembly weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The fail-safe friction mechanism is integrated directly into the actuator assembly, merging the fail-safe function with the existing actuator structure. This eliminates the need for separate external fail-safe components and reduces overall system complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-loaded friction mechanism automatically engages when control pressure is lost, providing self-activating fail-safe protection without requiring external sensors, controllers, or additional actuation systems. The mechanism serves itself by using the loss of control pressure as the triggering condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If multiple separate components are used for fail-safe protection, then reliability is improved, but ease of manufacture decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator fail-safe operationVSAvoidassembly integration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The fail-safe friction mechanism is integrated directly into the actuator assembly, merging the fail-safe function with the existing actuator structure. This eliminates the need for separate external fail-safe components and reduces overall system complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively prevents undesired movement of the actuator system following control signal failure, maintaining the last commanded position and reducing the risk of turbo machine stalls or surges, while also reducing weight and complexity compared to existing systems.

Implementation Method 1

a spring (126) to maintain a load on the first end (123) of the servo piston (124)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a friction mechanism (122) coupled to the second end (125) of the servo piston (124) to prevent rotation of the input drive assembly (130)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3653889B1Actuator fail fix system
Publication Date: 2024.10.23 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP3653889B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3653889B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3653889B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

An actuator assembly (90) including a fail-fix system is provided. The actuator assembly (90) includes an output shaft (110), an input drive assembly (130), and a piston assembly (120). The piston assembly (120) includes a body (115) surrounding a piston (124) moveable within the body (115). The body (115) defines a first end (123) and a second end (125) opposite thereof between which the piston (124) is moveable within the body (115). The piston assembly (120) includes a spring (126) disposed at the first end (123) between the body (115) and the piston (124). The piston assembly (120) includes a friction mechanism (122) disposed at the second end (125) of the piston (124) opposite of the first end (123). An adjustable area (135) is defined within the body (115) between the second end (125) of the piston (124) and the input drive assembly (130).