Aircraft Actuator Holding Assembly for Connection Body Failure
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Aircraft actuators can experience structural failures, leading to detachment and potential damage to the actuator and underlying structures due to aerodynamic and inertial loads, necessitating a solution to maintain the actuator within its normal working position.
Innovation Solution
The implementation of a holding device with a body extending between an attachment flange and a lug, fixedly attached to the actuator's main body and hingedly connected to the actuator support body, which prevents movement of the actuator from its normal working position in case of structural failure, using aviation-grade titanium alloy and a lap joint configuration for secure attachment.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If the actuator is hingedly attached to the actuator support body via a connection body, then the actuator can move within its normal working envelope, but structural failure of the connection body may cause the actuator to detach and move beyond its working envelope causing damage
Solution Approach 1:
The holding device is pre-positioned and pre-configured in normal operation, ready to engage automatically upon failure. The device includes a holding surface and engagement feature that are already in place before failure occurs, eliminating the need for complex detection or activation systems.
Solution Approach 2:
The holding device acts as an intermediary between the actuator and the actuator support body. It provides a secondary attachment mechanism that engages when the primary connection body fails, preventing the actuator from moving beyond its working envelope while allowing normal operation through the primary connection.
2Object-affected harmful factors
If a holding device is added to prevent actuator movement upon failure, then damage to surrounding structures is reduced, but the device complexity of the actuator assembly increases
Solution Approach 1:
The holding device is segmented into distinct functional components: a holding surface for contacting the actuator, an engagement feature for securing to the actuator support body, and a body connecting these elements. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies manufacturing and assembly.
Solution Approach 2:
The holding device is designed as a simple, robust structure that can be easily manufactured and replaced if needed. Its design prioritizes functionality and reliability over complexity, making it a cost-effective safety component that can be disposed of or replaced rather than repaired after failure events.
3Stability of the object's composition
If the holding device is fixedly attached to the actuator main body and hingedly connected to the actuator support body, then the actuator is constrained to normal working position upon failure, but the attachment requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The holding device merges two attachment methods: fixed attachment to the actuator main body (providing stable positioning) and hinged connection to the actuator support body (allowing normal movement). This combination achieves both stability and operational flexibility in a single integrated component.
Solution Approach 2:
The holding device serves multiple functions: it allows normal actuator movement through its hinged connection to the support body, provides automatic engagement upon failure, constrains the actuator to its working envelope, and distributes loads during failure events. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate safety mechanisms.
Data Source
AI summary
A holding device for an aircraft actuator, comprising a body that extends between a lug configured to hingedly connect the holding device to a actuator support body and an attachment flange configured to fixedly attach the holding device to a landing provided by a main body of an actuator. The holding device is configured to prevent movement of the actuator from a normal working position relative to the actuator support body in the event of structural failure of a connection body of the actuator.


