Micromechanical Actuator Joint Decouples Force and Deflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Micromechanical actuators face a trade-off between generating high force and achieving a large angular deflection, as longer electrodes are required for greater force but result in smaller maximum deflection angles, limiting their application and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The micromechanical actuator employs a shaft connected to a driving mechanism via a joint, allowing for a lever system that enables independent control of force and deflection angle through flexible electrode suspension, enabling parallel attraction and uniform force control, and allowing for greater forces and adjustable deflection angles without restricting electrode dimensions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the electrode length is increased to generate greater force, then the force output is improved, but the maximum deflection angle becomes smaller

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveforceVSAvoidelectrode length
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator is divided into separate functional components: the electrode assembly (for force generation) and the lever arm (for deflection control), connected through a joint. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each component - electrodes can be sized for maximum force while the lever arm provides the necessary mechanical advantage for large deflection angles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A joint is introduced as an intermediary element between the electrode assembly and the shaft. This joint acts as a mediator that decouples the force generation function from the deflection function, allowing the electrodes to exert force without being constrained by the deflection angle requirements, thereby resolving the trade-off between force and deflection angle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Force

If the electrode length is increased to generate greater force, then the force output is improved, but the device complexity increases due to swing-through space requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveforceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the electrode assembly from the shaft connection through an intermediate joint, the design eliminates the need for complex swing-through clearance. The joint absorbs the angular motion, allowing compact electrode positioning and simplifying the overall device structure while maintaining high force capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The joint serves as a mediator that handles the angular deflection independently, freeing the electrode assembly from swing-through space constraints. This intermediary element simplifies the device geometry by allowing straight, compact electrode paths without requiring additional clearance volume for angular movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Area of stationary object

If the processing depth into the substrate is increased to accommodate the drive electrodes, then the electrode area is improved, but the manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode areaVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The design transitions from a vertical stacking approach (requiring deep substrate processing) to a planar arrangement where the joint mechanism enables lateral expansion of the electrode area. By utilizing the horizontal plane rather than vertical depth, the actuator achieves large electrode area with minimal substrate penetration, simplifying manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The joint acts as an intermediary that enables the electrode assembly to be positioned optimally for maximum area utilization without requiring excessive substrate depth. This mediator allows the electrodes to be arranged in a configuration that maximizes area while maintaining shallow processing depth, thereby improving ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design allows for the generation of greater forces and adjustable deflection angles, simplifies production, reduces processing depth, and opens up new application fields by decoupling force and angle control, leading to cost savings and improved performance.

Implementation Method 1

at least the first driving mechanism or also the second driving mechanism is an electrostatic driving mechanism having at least one first electrode and one second electrode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic attraction: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS8791620B2Micromechanical actuator having multiple joints
Publication Date: 2014.07.29 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US8791620B2 patent drawing
  • US8791620B2 patent drawing
  • US8791620B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A micromechanical actuator includes a shaft and at least a first driving mechanism. The shaft and the first driving mechanism are connected by a first joint.