Actuator Load Abort Control for Test Article Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In testing systems, expensive test articles require rapid and effective unloading of loads to prevent damage, especially when load differentials become excessive.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a system controller that determines load differentials between calculated loads at a valve and a load cell, initiating a controlled unload when the differential reaches a first level and performing an interlock unload when it reaches a second, higher level, using a hydraulic assembly with a control valve and pressure transducers to manage the load differential.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rapid unloading is performed to prevent damage to test articles, then safety is improved, but load control precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidload control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The unloading process is segmented into two distinct phases: controlled unload (first level) and interlock unload (second level). This segmentation allows the system to apply different control strategies for different safety scenarios, maintaining precision when possible and prioritizing safety when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the unloading rate based on the load differential level. During controlled unload, a moderate unloading rate maintains precision, while during interlock unload, the rate increases to prioritize safety. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between precision and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If controlled unload is initiated at a lower load differential level, then safety margin is improved, but test productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety marginVSAvoidtest productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes predetermined load differential levels (first and second levels) as safety thresholds before testing begins. This preliminary action allows the system to operate efficiently within safe parameters while having pre-planned responses ready to activate if thresholds are exceeded, minimizing impact on productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the critical parameter (load differential threshold) from a single fixed value to a tiered structure with multiple levels. This allows the system to maintain higher productivity by operating up to the second level under normal conditions, while still providing safety margins through the first level threshold.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If load differential is rapidly reduced to prevent damage, then test article protection is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest article protectionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the load differential and provides feedback to the control system. This feedback mechanism enables automatic activation of appropriate unloading protocols based on real-time conditions, protecting the test article without requiring complex manual intervention systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed to automatically detect excessive load differentials and initiate the appropriate unloading protocol without external intervention. This self-service capability simplifies the overall system architecture by eliminating the need for complex manual safety systems while maintaining effective protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively mitigates the risk of damage to test articles by rapidly reducing load differentials through controlled and interlock unloading methods, ensuring safe and representative loading conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a hydraulic assembly with a control valve and pressure transducers to manage the load differential

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentEP4521088A1Controlled load abort in an actuator system
Publication Date: 2025.03.12 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • EP4521088A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4521088A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4521088A1 patent drawingFigure 4A

AI summary

A method for unloading a load on a test article in a testing system includes determining a load differential in at least one of a calculated load at a valve for an actuator of the testing system and a calculated load on a load cell coupled to the actuator. A controlled unload of the load on the test article is initiated via a system controller when the determined load differential a reaches a first level. An interlock unload of the load on the test article is performed via the valve when the determined load differential reaches a second level higher than the first level.