Linear Actuator Pole Design for Detent Force Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Linear electromagnetic actuators face challenges with detent force, which opposes motion and results in uneven force distribution, leading to reduced smoothness and increased energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

The actuator's poles are designed with non-uniform configurations, including varying widths and offset centers, to reduce detent force while maintaining consistent force output, achieved by modifying the dimensions and spacing of poles within manufacturing tolerances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If uniform poles are used in the actuator, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the detent force varies significantly causing uneven force distribution and reduced smoothness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepole manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidmotion smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making each pole have a different width configuration tailored to its specific position in the series. The first pole has a first width, the second pole has a second width different from the first, and subsequent poles have widths progressively adjusted. This local differentiation of pole dimensions optimizes the magnetic field distribution at each location, reducing detent force variations and improving motion smoothness while maintaining manufacturability through systematic dimensional variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If additional smaller poles are added before the first and after the last poles to compensate for detent force, then the detent force compensation is achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetent force compensationVSAvoidpole series complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying the width parameters of existing poles in the series rather than adding new poles. Each pole's width is adjusted according to its position, creating a progressive sequence of dimensional changes. This approach achieves detent force compensation through parameter optimization of the existing structure, avoiding the increased complexity that would result from adding additional poles before the first and after the last pole.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If pole widths are varied to reduce detent force variations, then the motion smoothness is improved, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce output consistencyVSAvoidpole dimension tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the pole series into distinct segments where each pole represents an independent manufacturing unit with its own optimized width. This segmentation allows for systematic control of dimensional variations, where each pole can be manufactured to the same tolerance standards but with different nominal widths. The segmented approach enables progressive width adjustments while maintaining consistent manufacturing precision requirements, avoiding the need for increasingly tight tolerances that would result from more complex continuous variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design significantly reduces detent force variations, enhancing the smoothness of motion and reducing energy required to overcome passive forces, resulting in improved operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a series of electromagnets to interact with the permanent magnets to induce movement of the permanent magnets along a path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the detent force tends to oppose motion of the moving element of the actuator relative to the stationary element of the actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS8067863B2Detent force correcting
Publication Date: 2011.11.29 CLEARMOTION ACQUISITION I LLC
  • US8067863B2 patent drawing
  • US8067863B2 patent drawing
  • US8067863B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus comprises a linear electromagnetic actuator which has a series of ferromagnetic poles, coils, and a series of permanent magnets to interact with the poles to induce movement of the actuator along a path. The poles have non-uniform configurations.