Actuator Position Sensing Error Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional position sensing systems for actuators, particularly linear actuators, face issues with contact wear and mechanical failures in contact-based methods and lack effective self-detection and correction mechanisms in non-contact methods, limiting their accuracy and practicality, especially when actuators have limited stroke or impractical reference points.

Innovation Solution

A position sensing system comprising a first sensor for detecting the rotational position of a movable portion, multiple second sensors for detecting the translational position, and a controller to calculate and correct positional errors by moving the actuator based on differences in data from these sensors, using Hall-Effect sensors and magnets to provide accurate and repetitive position checking without requiring travel to both ends of the actuator's range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If contact-based potentiometer is used for position sensing, then position accuracy is maintained, but contact wear and mechanical failures occur over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition accuracyVSAvoidcontact wear and mechanical failures
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the contact-based mechanical potentiometer with a non-contact sensing system using Hall-effect sensors and magnets. The Hall-effect sensor detects the position of a magnet attached to the actuator shaft, eliminating physical contact and associated wear while maintaining position measurement capability. This substitution resolves the contradiction by preserving measurement precision through magnetic field detection while eliminating contact wear and mechanical failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If non-contact Hall-effect sensor with single reference point is used, then device complexity is reduced, but position error accumulation occurs over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensing system complexityVSAvoidposition error accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary position verification by checking against a known reference point during actuator operation. When the actuator reaches the reference point, the system compares the measured position with the expected position and corrects any accumulated error. This preliminary correction action prevents long-term error accumulation while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the Hall-effect sensor continuously monitors actuator position, and the controller compares measured positions with expected positions based on motor commands. When discrepancies are detected, the system generates correction signals to adjust future position calculations, thereby preventing error accumulation while maintaining simple sensor hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If actuator travels to both extents for self-correction, then position error is corrected, but productivity is reduced due to extended travel time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition error correctionVSAvoidactuator cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring the actuator to travel to both extreme positions for error correction, the system uses a single reference point located within the normal operating range. The actuator only needs to reach this intermediate reference point periodically for correction, performing a partial correction action that is sufficient to maintain accuracy without the excessive travel time required by full-range correction methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Measurement precision

If actuator travels past reference point for reorientation, then position accuracy is restored, but ease of operation is reduced due to dedicated correction effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition accuracy restorationVSAvoidcorrection operation convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-correction automatically during normal operation without requiring dedicated correction maneuvers or external intervention. The Hall-effect sensor and controller work together to detect position errors and implement corrections autonomously as the actuator passes through the reference point, making the correction process transparent and convenient for the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system enables accurate and self-correcting position sensing for actuators, ensuring precise positioning without the need for extensive travel, thus overcoming limitations of stroke and practicality issues, and maintaining accuracy over time.

Implementation Method 1

non-contact sensing technology, such as Hall-effect sensors. In such an arrangement, for example, a rotating magnet located on an actuator shaft of the actuator is used in combination with a Hall-effect sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall-effect: Hall Effect

Data Source

PatentEP4121721B1Position sensing system with error detection and correction
Publication Date: 2024.05.22 CNH IND BELGIUM NV
  • EP4121721B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4121721B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4121721B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

An actuator position sensing system for sensing a position of an actuator. The actuator position sensing system includes a first sensor for detecting a position of a first moveable portion of the actuator; a plurality of second sensors each being configured for detecting a position of a second moveable portion of the actuator; and a controller connected to the first sensor and the plurality of second sensors. The controller is configured to calculate a difference between (i) a position of the second movable portion as calculated based upon the data transmitted from the first sensor, and (ii) a position of the second movable portion as calculated based upon the data transmitted from one or more of the plurality of second sensors. A motor is connected to the first movable portion and the controller, and the motor is configured to move the first moveable portion based upon the calculated difference.