Vehicle Actuator Control for Self-Locking Without Efficiency Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing actuators for motor vehicle components, such as parking brakes and rear spoilers, suffer from low efficiency, high maintenance requirements, and are often bulky and costly.

Innovation Solution

The proposed actuator design incorporates a non-self-locking drive gear driven by a motor, an escapement unit with a self-locking gear mechanism, and a control unit that allows asynchronous operation of the motors to prevent blockages and optimize efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a self-locking worm gear is used in the drive train, then the actuator achieves reliable self-locking function, but the efficiency becomes very low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-locking functionVSAvoidefficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator is divided into two independent drive trains: a non-self-locking drive train for primary actuation and a self-locking escapement drive train for security. This segmentation allows each subsystem to optimize for its specific function without compromising the other, resolving the contradiction between self-locking reliability and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The escapement gear acts as an intermediary mechanism that provides self-locking functionality without requiring the main drive train to be self-locking. The escapement mechanism engages only when needed for holding position, allowing the primary drive to operate efficiently while still achieving reliable self-locking through the escapement intermediary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a self-locking mechanism is implemented in the actuator, then safety is improved, but the actuator becomes more complex and requires maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidactuator complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The escapement mechanism is designed to engage and disengage automatically based on the drive train's operation, without requiring external control or intervention. This self-service capability reduces control complexity while maintaining safety, as the self-locking function activates only when the drive motor is not energized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The escapement mechanism transitions between engaged and disengaged states dynamically based on operational conditions. The self-locking function is not continuously active but engages only when needed, reducing mechanical complexity and maintenance requirements while preserving safety during critical holding periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Volume of stationary object

If the escapement motor is designed to be small and low-power, then the actuator volume and manufacturing costs are reduced, but the risk of blockage in the escapement gear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator volumeVSAvoidblockage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit implements preliminary anti-action by detecting potential blockage conditions and reversing the escapement motor's rotation direction before a blockage can occur. This preventive measure allows the use of a small, low-power escapement motor while mitigating the increased blockage risk through proactive control intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit monitors the escapement motor's operation and provides feedback control by reversing rotation direction when blockage is detected. This feedback mechanism enables reliable operation of a compact escapement motor by continuously adjusting its operation based on real-time conditions, preventing blockages despite the motor's limited power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances efficiency, reduces maintenance needs, and minimizes the actuator's size and production costs, while ensuring reliable operation and safety.

Implementation Method 1

an escapement unit (12) for inhibiting the drive train (2). The escapement unit (12) comprises a self-locking escapement gear (15)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-locking mechanism: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP4556745A1Actuator with a control unit for controlling an inhibiting unit
Publication Date: 2025.05.21 OECHSLER AG
  • EP4556745A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4556745A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4556745A1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3c

AI summary

The invention relates to an actuator (1) for an electrical component of a motor vehicle, having a drive train (2) comprising a drive gear (5) and a drive motor (3) for driving the drive gear (5), having an escapement unit (12) for escaping the drive train (2), which comprises a self-locking escapement gear (15) operatively connected to the drive gear (5) and an escapement motor (13) for driving the escapement gear (15), and having a control unit (29) for controlling the drive motor (3) and the escapement motor (13). According to the invention, the control unit (29) is designed such that the drive motor (3) and the escapement motor (13) can be operated asynchronously and/or with a time offset, particularly in a starting mode.