Electro-Hydraulic Servo-Actuator Slew-Rate Control for Pressure Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems for electro-hydraulic servo-actuators in turbopropeller engines do not fully exploit the actuators' capabilities and can lead to excessive speed during transients, causing pressure drops and impairing engine operation, with known solutions either limiting driving current to set values or requiring complex mechanical mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop control system that dynamically limits the actuator slew rate by using a derivative block to measure actuator speed and a limitation stage with a look-up table to adjust the driving current's rate of change, ensuring the actuator speed does not exceed set limits, thereby preventing excessive fuel diversion and maintaining stable engine operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the actuator driving current is limited to set maximum and minimum values, then the actuator speed is constrained, but the actuator's full capabilities are not exploited and the control system cannot respond quickly to transient conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator speedVSAvoidengine operation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors the actual actuator speed and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust the driving current. The measured actuator speed is compared against maximum and minimum speed limits, and the driving current is modified in real-time to ensure the actuator speed remains within acceptable bounds while allowing full capability utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the driving current parameter based on the measured actuator speed. Instead of using fixed current limits, the driving current is continuously adjusted according to the actual speed conditions, allowing the actuator to operate at full capability while maintaining speed within safe boundaries through real-time parameter modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If the actuator speed is allowed to increase during transients, then the response time improves, but excessive speed causes pressure drops and impairs engine operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control system uses feedback from the measured actuator speed to prevent harmful pressure drops. By continuously monitoring the actual speed and comparing it against maximum speed limits, the system can detect when the actuator is approaching speeds that would cause pressure drops, and immediately adjust the driving current to maintain safe operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary anti-action by preventing the actuator speed from reaching levels that would cause harmful pressure drops. Through continuous monitoring and proactive adjustment of the driving current before excessive speed is reached, the system avoids the harmful effects of pressure drops while still allowing rapid response during transients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Adaptability or versatility

If fixed maximum and minimum values are set for the driving current, then the actuator speed is bounded, but the control system lacks adaptability to varying operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol adaptabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system achieves adaptability through feedback mechanisms that automatically adjust the driving current based on measured actuator speed and operating conditions. This eliminates the need for complex manual tuning or multiple fixed control modes, as the feedback loop dynamically adapts the control parameters to varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-adjustment by using the measured actuator speed to automatically modify the driving current. The system serves itself by continuously monitoring its own performance and making real-time corrections without external intervention, achieving high adaptability while maintaining relatively simple control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The control system effectively limits actuator speed and prevents excessive fuel diversion, ensuring stable engine operation without requiring complex mechanical mechanisms, allowing full exploitation of the electro-hydraulic servo-actuator's capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

An electro-hydraulic servo-actuator provided with a torque motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

An electro-hydraulic servo-actuator provided with a torque motor moves a piston back and forth; a mechanical linkage transforms the rectilinear motion of the piston into a circular motion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentEP3587254B1Control system and method for an electro-hydraulic servo-actuator, in particular of a turbopropeller engine
Publication Date: 2021.11.17 GE AVIO SRL
  • EP3587254B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3587254B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3587254B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

A control system (50) for an electro-hydraulic servo-actuator (26) envisages: a controller (55), to generate a control current (Ic), designed to control actuation of the electro-hydraulic servo-actuator (26), implementing a position control loop based on a position error (ep), the position error (ep) being a difference between a reference position (Posref) and a measured position (Posmeas) of the electro-hydraulic servo-actuator (26); and a limitation stage (58), coupled to the controller (55) to provide a limitation of the actuator speed of the electro-hydraulic servo-actuator (26); the limitation stage (58) limits a rate of change of a driving current (Id) to be supplied to the electro-hydraulic servo-actuator (26), in order to limit the actuator speed.