Actuator Torque-Reaction Rod for Shock Load Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing actuator assemblies in aircraft, particularly those with no-back devices, face challenges in monitoring health and functionality due to the inability to effectively counteract feedback forces and sudden changes in torque, leading to potential failures and damage.

Innovation Solution

The actuator assembly incorporates a load limiter and sensors to detect changes in rod length and load direction, allowing for real-time monitoring of torque and health status, and a resilient mechanism to absorb shocks and limit axial forces, thereby protecting the assembly and detecting performance issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a no-back device is provided to prevent feedback forces from rotating the screw shaft, then reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of screw shaft rotation from feedback forcesVSAvoidcomplexity of no-back device
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The no-back device is segmented into two separate braking mechanisms: a first braking mechanism for clockwise braking forces and a second braking mechanism for anticlockwise braking forces. This segmentation allows each mechanism to be simpler and more specialized, while collectively providing comprehensive protection against feedback forces in both rotation directions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A rod is introduced as an intermediary element to react torque on the drive arrangement. The rod connects the drive arrangement to the airframe and transmits torque reactions, allowing the no-back device to function independently without directly complicating the screw shaft mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If braking forces are made sufficient to counteract maximum feedback torque, then reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesufficiency of braking forcesVSAvoidcomplexity of braking mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The braking function is divided into two separate mechanisms, each handling one direction of rotation. This allows each mechanism to be optimized for a single direction, reducing individual complexity while ensuring sufficient braking force in both clockwise and anticlockwise directions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each braking mechanism is designed with specific local properties tailored to its function: the first braking mechanism is optimized for clockwise forces while the second is optimized for anticlockwise forces. This local specialization reduces overall complexity compared to a single universal braking mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If the drive arrangement is pivotally supported to float about the screw shaft axis, then adaptability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to float about screw shaft axisVSAvoidcomplexity of pivotal support
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pivotal support functionality is merged with the torque reaction rod. The rod serves dual purposes: reacting torque on the drive arrangement and enabling pivotal movement. This combination reduces device complexity by eliminating separate pivotal support components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rod is designed as a multi-functional element that simultaneously reacts torque, allows pivotal movement, and provides a mounting structure for the drive arrangement. This universality reduces overall system complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables continuous monitoring of the actuator's health and functionality, reducing the risk of failure and damage by absorbing sudden torque changes and providing a protective function, while also allowing for the computation of fatigue life consumption and endurance life consumption of components.

Implementation Method 1

a resilient mechanism to absorb shocks and limit axial forces, thereby protecting the assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3854693B1Actuator assembly and a method of reacting torque on the same
Publication Date: 2023.12.20 RATIER FIGEAC SAS
  • EP3854693B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3854693B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3854693B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An actuator assembly may comprise a screw shaft having a shaft axis; a drive arrangement pivotally supported about the screw shaft axis for driving the screw shaft, e.g., about the shaft axis or along the shaft axis, and a rod mounted to the drive arrangement at a location off the shaft axis for providing a primary function of reacting torque about the shaft axis on the drive arrangement. The rod may comprise a rod axis and provide a load path along the rod axis for reacting torque. The rod may also comprise a device for which provides a secondary function for the actuator assembly based on the load experienced along the load path provided by the rod.