Actuator Valve Asymmetric Piston Prevents Stalling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional actuator valves in air operated double diaphragm pumps suffer from stalling issues, where the valve piston becomes stuck at a central position due to balanced forces, leading to pump downtime and requiring manual intervention to restart.

Innovation Solution

The actuator valve design includes a valve piston with a bore and end plates having bosses that mate to create an unequal surface area, preventing centralization and thus preventing stalling, along with a key and slot arrangement to restrict rotary motion, ensuring continuous operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a conventional actuator valve with a valve piston is used, then the pump can operate automatically without manual control, but the valve piston may stall at a central position when forces on either end become equal, causing pump downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic operationVSAvoidstalling prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The valve piston is designed with an asymmetric surface area configuration where the surface area on one side is intentionally made different from the other side. This asymmetric design ensures that even when the pump operates in a stalled condition with equal forces on either end of the valve piston, the piston cannot achieve a stable central position. The unequal surface areas create a mechanical imbalance that prevents stalling and ensures continuous operation, thereby resolving the contradiction between automatic operation and stalling prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Speed

If the valve piston is designed to move freely to control air flow, then the pump can respond quickly to pressure changes, but the piston becomes stuck at central position during stalling, requiring manual intervention to restart

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidmanual intervention requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric surface area design of the valve piston eliminates the need for manual intervention by preventing stalling from occurring in the first place. The mechanical imbalance created by the unequal surface areas ensures that the piston cannot remain stuck at a central position even when forces equalize, allowing the pump to respond continuously to pressure changes without requiring operator intervention to restart the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Ease of manufacture

If a simple valve piston design is used, then the manufacturing cost is reduced, but the valve piston is prone to stalling which causes production downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidproduction continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric surface area configuration is achieved through simple geometric design differences on the valve piston surfaces, which can be manufactured using conventional machining operations. This design modification is cost-effective to implement while dramatically improving production continuity by preventing stalling-related downtime, thereby resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and production continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents stalling of the valve piston, ensuring continuous operation of the air operated double diaphragm pump without the need for manual intervention, enhancing reliability and reducing downtime.

Implementation Method 1

The valve piston is configured to control the incoming flow of pressurized air to provide an alternating flow to a reciprocating central shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

This alternating flow forces the central shaft to stroke back and forth thereby performing useful work

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid force: Force

Data Source

PatentUS11746771B2Actuator valve of an air operated double diaphragm pump
Publication Date: 2023.09.05 TERYAIR EQUIP PVT LTD
  • US11746771B2 patent drawing
  • US11746771B2 patent drawing
  • US11746771B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to an actuator valve 136 of an air operated double diaphragm pump 100. The actuator valve 136 includes a valve housing 138, an inlet 142 for receiving air, a first set of ports 144a,144b for exchanging the air with air chambers 132a,132b, and a second set of ports 146a,146b for exhausting the air received from the air chambers 132a,132b into the atmosphere. The actuator valve 136 further includes a valve piston 148 accommodated within the valve housing 138. The valve piston 148 is configured to reciprocally slide within the valve housing 138 and has a bore 152 at one end. The actuator valve 136 further includes an end plate 156a,156b at each end of the valve housing 138, and has a boss 158 at the corresponding end. The boss 158 and the bore 152 are arranged such that the boss 158 mates with the bore 152.