Acyclic Network Reliability Evaluation via Node-Based Path Search

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional network reliability evaluation methods for acyclic networks are complex and time-consuming, particularly when searching for all minimal paths, as they often rely on arcs rather than nodes, leading to inefficient calculation processes.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize the characteristics of acyclic networks to find all minimal paths by setting node sets and count values, using upper and lower limit values to exclude improbable paths, and leveraging adjacent nodes to accelerate the identification of minimal paths, thereby reducing computational complexity and enhancing calculation speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional methods using arcs to search for minimal paths are applied, then completeness of path finding is ensured, but computational complexity increases and calculation speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation speedVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by switching from arc-based path searching to node-based path searching. Instead of traversing arcs to find minimal paths, the method uses node sets and adjacent node relationships to identify paths, fundamentally reversing the search paradigm to achieve lower computational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the search parameters from arc-level operations to node-level operations. By using node sets (Vp), count values (k), and adjacent node identifiers, the method transforms the search space and operation granularity, reducing the computational burden while maintaining path finding completeness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If all minimal paths are exhaustively searched to ensure accurate reliability evaluation, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability evaluation accuracyVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing node sets, setting upper and lower limit values for path length, and pre-identifying adjacent node relationships before the actual path searching begins. This preliminary structuring enables faster and more efficient minimal path identification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the path searching process into discrete node sets (Vp) with specific count values (k). By dividing the network into manageable node segments and using adjacent node identifiers, the method systematically identifies minimal paths without exhaustive searching, reducing time loss while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9906414B2Network reliability evaluation method for acyclic network and system thereof
Publication Date: 2018.02.27 NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY
  • US9906414B2 patent drawing
  • US9906414B2 patent drawing
  • US9906414B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A network reliability evaluation method for an acyclic network and a system thereof are provided. The network reliability evaluation method searches all minimal paths from a source node to a sink source based on nodes according to the properties of the acyclic network. In conventional network reliability evaluation methods, searching all minimal paths is based on arcs. Therefore, the network reliability evaluation method and the system thereof can effectively reduce the complexity of calculation.