Ad Placement Recommender for Sequential Workflow Drop-Off Risk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing advertisement placement systems in sequential user workflows often disrupt the primary activity, leading to potential loss of users, resource contention, and inefficient monetization, as they fail to balance the risk-reward tradeoff of secondary advertisements during the user's progression through stages.

Innovation Solution

A system that evaluates risk-reward scores for potential secondary advertisements using machine learning techniques, setting stage-specific thresholds, and selecting advertisements based on projected direct returns, impact on primary activity completion, and contextual factors to optimize placement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If advertisements are placed during user workflow stages, then monetization revenue is increased, but user completion rate of primary activity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonetization revenueVSAvoiduser completion rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts advertisement placement parameters including risk-reward thresholds, stage selection criteria, and advertisement timing based on real-time workflow progression and user behavior patterns. This allows optimization of both revenue generation and completion rates by adapting placement strategies to specific workflow contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The advertisement placement system transitions from static to dynamic decision-making by continuously evaluating user progression through workflow stages, adjusting placement opportunities in real-time based on current stage, user engagement level, and predicted completion probability. This dynamic approach balances revenue maximization with completion rate preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of energy

If multiple advertisements are displayed during workflow stages, then advertisement revenue is maximized, but user distraction and resource contention increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertisement revenueVSAvoiduser distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different advertisement placement strategies to different workflow stages based on their specific characteristics. High-criticality stages receive fewer or no advertisements, while lower-criticality stages can accommodate more placements. This localized approach ensures revenue generation without excessive distraction in sensitive areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system selectively places advertisements in only certain workflow stages rather than uniformly across all stages. By identifying and targeting specific stages with appropriate advertisement density, the system achieves sufficient revenue generation while minimizing overall user distraction and resource contention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of information

If advertisements are placed early in workflow stages, then advertisement exposure is increased, but risk of user dropout before completion increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertisement exposureVSAvoiduser completion rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates and prepares advertisement placement decisions in advance based on predicted workflow progression and user behavior patterns. By pre-assessing the impact of potential placements on completion probability, the system can select optimal moments that balance exposure opportunities with completion rate protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors user progression through workflow stages and uses this feedback to adjust advertisement placement timing and frequency. Real-time feedback on user engagement and stage completion allows dynamic modification of placement strategy to maintain both exposure and completion rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12567088B2Recommender for advertisement placements in sequential workflows
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12567088B2 patent drawing
  • US12567088B2 patent drawing
  • US12567088B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may include a memory and a processor in communication with the memory. The processor may be configured to perform operations. The operations may include engaging a user in a primary activity; the primary activity may include a plurality of stages. The operations may include compiling at least one risk-reward score for an advertisement placement of an advertisement for at least one of the plurality of stages. The operations may include identifying a recommended stage for the advertisement; the recommended stage may be based on the risk-reward score. The operations may include displaying the advertisement to the user at the recommended stage.