Ad Space Allocation for Multi-Brand TRP and GRP Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing advertisement allocation systems fail to efficiently allocate advertisements to specific targets without increasing the calculation load.

Innovation Solution

An advertisement material allocation system that determines optimal advertisement space allocation for multiple brands by maximizing target rating points and minimizing achievement rate differences using a multi-stage optimization method.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If optimization method is applied to allocate advertisement material for multiple brands, then allocation efficiency for specific target is improved, but calculation amount becomes enormous

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveallocation efficiencyVSAvoidcalculation amount
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the advertisement allocation problem into two distinct stages: first allocating advertisement spaces to brands based on GRP targets, then allocating specific advertisement materials to those spaces based on TRP targets. This segmentation divides the enormous calculation problem into manageable sub-problems, reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining allocation efficiency for specific targets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary allocation of advertisement spaces to brands in the first stage before conducting the second stage of material allocation. By pre-determining which brands receive which advertisement spaces based on GRP constraints, the system reduces the search space for the subsequent TRP optimization, thereby reducing calculation amount while improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If advertisement material for specific target is introduced, then effectiveness for specific target is improved, but allocation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness for specific targetVSAvoidallocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent separates allocation complexity into two distinct phases: GRP-based space allocation and TRP-based material allocation. This segmentation allows the system to handle specific target effectiveness (TRP) without overwhelming complexity, as each phase addresses one dimension of the problem independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces advertisement spaces as an intermediary entity between brands and advertisement materials. This intermediary structure simplifies the allocation process by creating a clear hierarchy: brands → advertisement spaces → advertisement materials, making the system more manageable while maintaining effectiveness for specific targets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250384460A1Advertisement material allocation system, advertisement material allocation device, advertisement material allocation method, and advertisement material allocation program
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 DENTSU INC
  • US20250384460A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384460A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384460A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An advertisement material allocation system includes: an acquisition unit configured to acquire setting information on allocation including information on a target value; and a control unit configured to determine, based on the setting information, information indicating a correspondence relationship between each advertisement space and a brand to be allocated to each advertisement space, with respect to which brand advertisement material among a plurality of brands is to be allocated to each advertisement space, in which the control unit determines information indicating a first correspondence relationship that maximizes a minimum value for all brands among achievement rates regarding a target rating point (TRP) for each brand under a condition that satisfies a first rule including a constraint that a gross rating point (GRP) or an individual GRP is equal to or greater than the target value.