Adaptable Vehicle Frame Assembly for Dual Suspension Configurations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle frame assemblies are not adaptable to accommodate both solid axle and independent rear suspension systems without significant modifications, leading to increased weight, cost, and reduced dynamic performance and fuel efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle frame assembly with multiple mounting locations configured to accommodate different suspension system configurations, allowing for the use of either a 3-link or 5-link suspension system without requiring substantial modifications to the frame, thereby enabling the production of multiple vehicle models with reduced weight and cost penalties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a vehicle frame is designed to accommodate a solid axle rear suspension system, then it cannot accommodate an independent rear suspension system without significant modifications, but manufacturing separate frames for each suspension type increases weight, cost, and reduces productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension system compatibilityVSAvoidframe production efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle frame assembly is designed with multiple mounting locations that can accommodate different suspension system configurations (solid axle or independent suspension). The frame includes a main frame assembly and a frame assembly with multiple mounting locations, allowing a single frame design to serve multiple suspension system types without significant modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The frame assembly is divided into a main frame assembly and a frame assembly with multiple mounting locations. This segmentation allows the mounting locations to be selectively configured for different suspension systems while maintaining the integrity of the main frame structure, enabling flexibility without redesigning the entire frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If significant modifications are made to the vehicle frame to accommodate different suspension systems, then suspension adaptability is achieved, but manufacturing cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension system compatibilityVSAvoidframe manufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The frame assembly incorporates multiple mounting locations that can be used with different suspension system configurations. This universal design allows the same frame to accommodate both solid axle and independent suspension systems without requiring significant modifications, thereby maintaining ease of manufacture while achieving suspension adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting locations are designed to be selectively usable, allowing the frame configuration to adapt dynamically to different suspension requirements. This selective usability enables the frame to maintain a standardized manufacturing process while accommodating varying suspension system needs through configuration selection rather than physical modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If separate vehicle frames are manufactured for different suspension systems, then each frame is optimized for its specific suspension type, but vehicle weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension system performanceVSAvoidvehicle frame weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

A single frame assembly design with multiple mounting locations can support both solid axle and independent suspension systems. This eliminates the need to manufacture separate frames for different suspension types, reducing overall vehicle weight and manufacturing cost while maintaining the reliability and performance optimization for each suspension configuration through selective mounting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9663145B2Vehicle frame assembly and method of use and manufacture thereof
Publication Date: 2017.05.30 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US9663145B2 patent drawing
  • US9663145B2 patent drawing
  • US9663145B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments are directed to a vehicle frame assembly configured to accommodate different first and second suspension system configurations via mounting fixtures. The vehicle frame assembly can include a main frame assembly, and a frame assembly connected to and extending away from the main frame assembly. Multiple mounting locations can be provided on at least one of the main frame assembly and the frame assembly, each of the mounting locations being configured to accommodate one of the mounting fixtures. The mounting locations can include a first set configured for use with the first suspension system configuration, and a second set configured for use with the second suspension system configuration.