Adaptable Software Resource Managers for Atypical Usage Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional product and software design methodologies often result in sub-optimal performance when products are used in atypical manners, as they are optimized for 'typical' usage patterns, leading to inefficient resource management in computer-executable systems.

Innovation Solution

An adaptable resource manager that can utilize multiple algorithms and mechanisms to dynamically adjust resource allocation based on inferred or programmatically indicated user intentions, supporting various modes of operation and environmental constraints to optimize resource usage across different scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If resource managers are designed to optimize for typical usage patterns, then performance for typical usage is improved, but performance for atypical usage deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance for typical usageVSAvoidperformance for atypical usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The resource manager dynamically switches between multiple resource management algorithms based on detected usage patterns. Instead of being static and optimized for a single typical usage scenario, the system adapts its behavior in real-time by selecting from multiple algorithms (e.g., round-robin, priority-based, fair-share) depending on whether the current usage matches typical patterns or represents atypical usage scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of resource management by maintaining multiple algorithms with different optimization characteristics and selecting the appropriate algorithm based on usage pattern detection. This allows the resource manager to adjust its operational parameters (which algorithm is active) based on whether typical or atypical usage is detected, thereby resolving the contradiction between optimizing for typical usage while maintaining adaptability for atypical usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple resource management algorithms are maintained, then adaptability to different usage patterns is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to usage patternsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A usage pattern detection module serves as an intermediary between the multiple resource management algorithms and the actual resource allocation process. This mediator detects current usage patterns and selects the appropriate algorithm, thereby managing the complexity of having multiple algorithms without requiring the system to manually configure or switch between them. The intermediary abstracts the complexity away from the core resource management functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The resource management system automatically detects usage patterns and selects appropriate algorithms without requiring external configuration or manual intervention. The system serves itself by monitoring its own usage patterns and autonomously switching between algorithms, which reduces the operational complexity despite maintaining multiple algorithms in the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If resource allocation is dynamically adjusted based on usage monitoring, then resource utilization efficiency is improved, but response time for algorithm switching increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidresponse time for algorithm switching
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple resource management algorithms are pre-loaded and ready in memory, with their parameters pre-configured for different usage scenarios. When a usage pattern change is detected, the system can immediately switch to the appropriate pre-prepared algorithm without needing to compute or configure it on-the-fly. This preliminary preparation eliminates the time penalty that would otherwise be associated with dynamic algorithm switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9864637B2Adaptable software resource managers based on intentions
Publication Date: 2018.01.09 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US9864637B2 patent drawing
  • US9864637B2 patent drawing
  • US9864637B2 patent drawing

AI summary

User intentions can be derived from observations of user actions or they can be programmatically specified by an application or component that is performing an action. The intentions can then be utilized to adjust the operation of resource managers to better suit the actions being performed by the user or application, especially if such actions are not “typical”. Resource managers can inform a centralized intention manager of environmental constraints, including constraints on the resources they manage and constraints on their operation, such as various, pre-programmed independent modes of operation optimized for differencing circumstances. The intention manager can then instruct the resource managers in accordance with these environmental constraints when the intention manager is made aware of the intentions. If no further optimization can be achieved, specified intentions may not result in directives from the intention manager to the resource managers.