Adaptable Shock Tower System with Braces and Adhesive

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle body structures, particularly in light-duty vehicles, face challenges in achieving optimal stiffness and strength due to the lack of a separate load-carrying internal frame, especially when adapting to different body-variants such as coupes and convertibles, which require specific structural reinforcements to handle varying loads and constraints.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle body-variant adaptable shock tower system is introduced, featuring shock towers and caps with adjustable braces and adhesives, along with fasteners, to reinforce the vehicle body structure. This system includes high-integrity aluminum die-casting components with specific geometric configurations and material properties to enhance stiffness and strength, accommodating different vehicle body types by varying the number and angle of braces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a separate body and frame structure is used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but structural rigidity and strength deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidstructural rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the body and frame into a unified load-carrying structure where the body panels and structural members work together as an integrated system. This integration allows the body structure itself to bear loads, eliminating the need for a separate traditional frame while maintaining or improving structural rigidity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The body structure is designed to serve multiple functions simultaneously: it provides the exterior shell, supports the powertrain, carries cargo, and bears structural loads. This multi-functionality allows a single structure to replace what would traditionally require separate body and frame components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Strength

If an integral body structure is used, then structural rigidity is improved, but adaptability to different body-variants deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural rigidityVSAvoidadaptability to body-variants
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The integral body structure is divided into modular components and subassemblies that can be selectively configured. This segmentation allows the same basic platform to be adapted into different body-variants (such as pickup trucks, SUVs, or cargo vehicles) by reconfiguring or adding specific structural members and panels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The body structure incorporates dynamic design elements that allow it to be adapted for different configurations. This may include removable panels, adjustable structural members, or modular sections that can be repositioned or removed to create different body styles while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If additional structural members are added to reinforce the body, then strength is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebody structure strengthVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly reinforcing the entire body structure, the patent applies additional structural members and reinforcement only in specific locations where loads are concentrated or where structural strength is most needed. This localized approach provides necessary strength while minimizing the overall number of components and structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The design uses partial reinforcement strategies, adding structural members only where absolutely necessary to meet strength requirements, rather than over-reinforcing the entire structure. This selective approach optimizes the balance between strength and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11034387B2Vehicle body-variant adaptable shock tower system
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US11034387B2 patent drawing
  • US11034387B2 patent drawing
  • US11034387B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle body-variant adaptable shock tower system for a vehicle body structure having an axis, a vehicle frame rail arranged along the axis, a bulkhead arranged orthogonally relative to the frame rail. The system includes a shock tower spaced apart from the bulkhead and fixed to the frame rail. The system also includes a shock tower cap defining a plurality of receivers and a plurality of braces, wherein the number of braces corresponds to the body-variant. Each brace extends from the shock tower through a respective one of the receivers to the bulkhead, and is fixed to the shock tower and the bulkhead. The system additionally includes an adhesive applied between the shock tower cap, the plurality of braces, and the shock tower to thereby bond the shock tower cap, the braces, and the shock tower to each other and reinforce the vehicle body structure.