Adaptive 3D Printing for Sintering Deformation Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Additive manufacturing techniques face challenges in accurately predicting and compensating for deformation and stress-induced changes in metal objects during the sintering and debinding processes, leading to geometrical inaccuracies in the final product.

Innovation Solution

The method involves dividing a 3D model into segments, calculating predicted deformations and stress values based on cross-sectional area and mass distribution, and updating print parameters to incorporate modified geometries that account for these changes, ensuring the printed object compensates for anticipated deformations during sintering and debinding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional additive manufacturing processes are used without deformation prediction, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the geometric accuracy of the final product deteriorates due to uncontrolled deformation during sintering and debinding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric accuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculation of deformation and stress values before the actual printing process. By predicting the deformation that will occur during sintering and debinding, the system pre-compensates the 3D model geometry, ensuring the final product achieves the desired geometric accuracy without requiring complex real-time adjustments during manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The 3D model is divided into multiple segments or regions, with deformation calculations performed for each segment based on its specific stress conditions. This segmentation allows for localized geometry modification in high-stress areas while maintaining standard printing parameters in low-stress areas, improving accuracy without uniformly increasing process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If stress-based geometry modification is applied to all segments, then geometric accuracy improves, but the computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies geometry modification selectively based on local stress conditions. By calculating stress values for each segment and applying modified geometry only where stress exceeds thresholds or deformation is significant, the system achieves high geometric accuracy in critical areas while minimizing unnecessary computational overhead in areas where standard printing parameters suffice

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If detailed stress calculation based on cross-sectional area and mass distribution is performed, then prediction accuracy improves, but the computational load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational power
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The model is divided into discrete segments, allowing stress calculations to be performed independently for each segment based on its cross-sectional area and the mass of segments above it. This segmentation enables the use of simplified computational formulas for each segment while maintaining overall prediction accuracy, reducing the total computational load compared to a full finite element analysis of the entire model

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a higher fidelity to the target geometry of the final product by accurately predicting and mitigating deformation and shrinkage effects, improving the accuracy and precision of additive manufacturing outcomes.

Implementation Method 1

During sintering, the part is brought to a temperature near the melting point of the powdered metal, which evaporates any remaining binder and forming the metal powder into a solid mass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 2

the part is brought to a temperature near the melting point of the powdered metal, which evaporates any remaining binder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

a predicted gravitational force on the object during a sintering process (e.g., in a debinded state, and/or during a bulk sintering process)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS11718037B2Adaptive 3D printing
Publication Date: 2023.08.08 DESKTOP METAL INC
  • US11718037B2 patent drawing
  • US11718037B2 patent drawing
  • US11718037B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods provide for fabricating objects through additive manufacturing in a manner that compensates for deformations introduced during post-print processing, such as sintering. An initial model may be divided into a plurality of segments, the initial model defining geometry of an object. For each of the segments, modified geometry may be calculated, where the modified geometry compensates for a predicted deformation. Print parameters can then be updated to incorporate the modified geometry, where the print parameters define geometry of the printed object (e.g., configuration settings of the printer, a tool path, an object model). The object may then be printed based on the updated print parameters.