Adaptive Absence EEG Stage Division Scheme Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating absence EEGs, particularly in young patients, lack reliability due to age-dependent characteristics and varying brain maturity, making it difficult to accurately determine the current stage of absence states.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for automatically evaluating absence EEGs that select a development- or age-adapted stage division scheme from multiple options, allowing for flexible adaptation and reliable determination of the current stage, using EEG curves recorded by an evaluation device and processed by a computer, which can change schemes based on identified features during the absence state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed stage division scheme is used for all patients, then the evaluation method is simple and easy to implement, but the reliability of stage determination is poor for very young patients due to age-dependent EEG characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of stage determinationVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation method
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic stage division scheme that automatically adapts to the patient's age and EEG characteristics. The system selects from multiple pre-defined stage division schemes (first, second, third schemes with different numbers of stages) based on the patient's age group, allowing the evaluation method to change its parameters dynamically rather than using a fixed scheme for all patients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of stage division granularity based on patient age. For very young patients (e.g., newborns), a scheme with fewer stages is used, while for older patients, a scheme with more stages is applied. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by matching the complexity of the evaluation scheme to the maturity of the patient's brain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple age-adapted stage division schemes are implemented, then the evaluation is more reliable for different patient groups, but the device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of current stage determinationVSAvoidcomplexity of multiple scheme selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary classification of patients into age groups before applying the detailed stage division. By pre-defining multiple stage division schemes corresponding to different age groups and selecting the appropriate scheme based on the patient's age, the system avoids the complexity of real-time analysis of EEG characteristics while still achieving age-adapted precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the patient population into different age groups, each with its own optimized stage division scheme. This segmentation allows the system to apply simpler schemes to newborns and more complex schemes to older patients, optimizing measurement precision for each group without requiring the system to handle all cases with the most complex scheme.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the stage division scheme is changed dynamically during evaluation, then the evaluation adapts to brain maturity development, but the computational processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to brain maturityVSAvoidevaluation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs the scheme selection in advance based on the patient's age rather than dynamically during the EEG evaluation. The appropriate stage division scheme is selected before the actual stage determination process begins, avoiding time-consuming dynamic adjustments during the evaluation while still achieving adaptability to the patient's developmental stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10039465B2Method for automatically evaluating an absence EEG, computer program and evaluating device therefor
Publication Date: 2018.08.07 SCHULTZ ARTHUR
  • US10039465B2 patent drawing
  • US10039465B2 patent drawing
  • US10039465B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for automatically evaluating an absence EEG, wherein EEG curves are recorded by an evaluating device and are evaluated by means of a computer of the evaluating device, wherein in the evaluation at least the current stage of the absent state is determined from the EEG curves by means of the computer on the basis of a stage division of the absence EEG, wherein stages of the depth of the absent state are distinguished in the stage division, and wherein the current stage is output, wherein a certain scheme of the stage division is selected by the computer from a plurality of selectable schemes of stage divisions, which differ in the number of distinguishable stages of the absent state, and is used for the automatic performance of the stage division in order to determine the current stage. The invention further relates to a computer program for performing such a method and to an evaluating device for evaluating an absence EEG.