Adaptive ACC Control Parameter Customization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Advanced driver assistance systems, such as adaptive cruise control, are calibrated with predefined settings that may not align with individual driver preferences, leading to discomfort and frustration as some drivers find the systems initiate braking too late or accelerate too aggressively or conservatively.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a learning mode in the advanced driver assistance system that allows drivers to provide feedback on the vehicle's control aggressiveness, enabling the system to adjust and customize control parameters such as time gaps, acceleration, and deceleration profiles to match the driver's comfort level.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single predefined tuning is used for ACC, then the system is simple to manufacture and operate, but it cannot satisfy individual driver comfort preferences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to driver preferencesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control parameters into multiple independent dimensions (acceleration rate, deceleration rate, time gap, reaction time) that can be individually adjusted. This allows the system to offer customized tuning without requiring a complete redesign of the control architecture, thereby increasing adaptability while managing complexity through modular parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static predefined tuning to dynamic adaptive tuning by introducing learning modes that adjust parameters in real-time based on driver feedback. The control parameters become dynamic variables that evolve with driver interaction, enabling the system to adapt to individual preferences without fixed configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the ACC function is calibrated with aggressive acceleration and late braking, then productivity is improved, but driver comfort deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle acceleration speedVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multiple parameter change options that allow drivers to select between aggressive (higher productivity) and comfortable (lower productivity) tuning profiles. Key parameters such as acceleration rate, deceleration rate, and time gap can be adjusted to different values, enabling the system to optimize for either productivity or comfort based on driver preference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows dynamic switching between different control aggressiveness levels through learning modes. Drivers can transition from aggressive parameter settings to comfortable settings as the system learns their preferences, enabling flexible adaptation between productivity-oriented and comfort-oriented operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the ACC function uses fixed time gaps and acceleration profiles, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different driving situations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization to driving situationsVSAvoidcontrol parameter flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the control system into separable parameter modules (time gap, acceleration profile, deceleration profile, reaction time) that can be independently customized. This segmentation allows drivers to adjust individual parameters without affecting others, providing situational adaptability while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves multi-functionality by incorporating multiple learning modes (comfort mode, sport mode, custom mode) that can handle different driving situations with a single unified control architecture. This universal approach allows the same base system to adapt to various driving scenarios without requiring separate specialized systems for each situation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11634130B2Adapting an advanced driver assistance system of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.04.25 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11634130B2 patent drawing
  • US11634130B2 patent drawing
  • US11634130B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for adapting an advanced driver assistance driving system of a vehicle. One system includes an electronic processor of an advanced driver assistance driving system. The electronic processor is configured to control the vehicle using a control parameter of the advanced driver assistance driving system. The electronic processor is also configured to activate a learning mode for the advanced driver assistance driving system and receive feedback associated with the control of the vehicle. The electronic processor is also configured to adjust the control parameter of the advanced driver assistance driving system based on the feedback and control the vehicle using the adjusted control parameter.