Adaptive Additive Manufacturing Simulation With Thermal Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing simulations fail to capture real-time thermal variations and printer-specific operational changes, leading to inaccuracies in 3D printing processes.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing thermal sensor data from the boundaries of the build volume to adapt simulation parameters in real-time, ensuring accurate and timely predictions of the printing process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing additive manufacturing simulations are used, then the simulation can be performed, but the simulation fails to capture real-time thermal variations and printer-specific operational changes, leading to inaccuracies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation accuracyVSAvoidreal-time adaptation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring thermal variations and printer operational parameters during the additive manufacturing process, then using this feedback to dynamically adjust simulation parameters. This closed-loop approach allows the simulation to adapt to real-time changes in the printing process, capturing thermal variations and printer-specific operational changes that static simulations miss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The simulation transitions from a static model to a dynamic one by continuously updating simulation parameters based on real-time sensor data. The simulation model adapts its boundary conditions, material properties, and process parameters dynamically during printing, allowing it to reflect the actual evolving state of the manufacturing process rather than relying on predetermined fixed parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If real-time thermal sensor data is integrated to adapt simulation parameters, then the accuracy and timeliness of simulation results improve, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting process control accuracyVSAvoidsimulation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer that bridges the thermal sensor data and the simulation model. This intermediary component processes raw sensor readings, correlates them with simulation parameters, and automatically adjusts the simulation accordingly. This mediator simplifies the integration process by handling the complexity of data fusion and parameter mapping, making the system more manageable despite the added real-time capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes simulation parameters based on real-time thermal sensor data without fundamentally altering the simulation framework. By adjusting specific parameters such as boundary conditions, thermal conductivity, and process temperatures based on sensor readings, the system achieves adaptive accuracy while maintaining the underlying simulation architecture, thus limiting the increase in overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the accuracy and timeliness of 3D printing by providing up-to-the-moment simulation results, allowing for improved control and correction of printing processes.

Implementation Method 1

Thermal sensing may provide an amount of thermal information (e.g., a relatively small amount of spatial thermal information of the build volume and/or a relatively small amount of temporal thermal information over about 50 hours of build and cooling)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal sensing: Thermography

Implementation Method 2

Some examples of 3D printing may selectively deposit agents (e.g., droplets) at a pixel level to enable control over voxel-level energy deposition. For instance, thermal energy may be projected over material in a build area, where a phase change (for example, melting and solidification) in the material may occur

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

thermal energy may be projected over material in a build area, where a phase change (for example, melting and solidification) in the material may occur depending on the voxels where the agents are deposited

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy projection: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS12373618B2Adaptive simulation in additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 PERIDOT PRINT LLC
  • US12373618B2 patent drawing
  • US12373618B2 patent drawing
  • US12373618B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for adapting a boundary condition of a simulation of 3D manufacturing are provided. The simulation of 3D manufacturing is based on thermal sensor data from a thermal sensor at a point of a build enclosure are provided.