Adaptive Antenna Array Reconfiguration for Real-Time Network Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing antenna systems lack the ability to adaptively and efficiently adjust their configuration in real-time to optimize performance metrics such as data throughput, call drop rate, and energy consumption based on dynamic network conditions.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for controlling radiating elements of an antenna array using machine learning models to iteratively update configuration parameters, including position, azimuth, and elevation angles, to move performance metrics towards a target value, with real-time or near real-time reconfiguration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If antenna configuration parameters are adjusted manually or through traditional methods, then system complexity is reduced, but adaptability to dynamic network conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to dynamic network conditionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where performance metrics are continuously monitored and fed back to the machine learning model, which then adjusts configuration parameters accordingly. This enables automatic adaptation to changing network conditions without manual intervention, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model autonomously performs configuration optimization without requiring external control or manual adjustment. The system serves itself by automatically learning from performance data and making configuration changes, thereby achieving high adaptability while keeping the control system simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If machine learning models are used to iteratively update configuration parameters in real-time, then adaptability improves, but processing time and computational energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time configuration adaptationVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model is pre-trained offline using historical performance data to learn optimal configuration strategies. During real-time operation, the pre-trained model makes rapid predictions and adjustments without requiring extensive iterative computation, thus achieving real-time adaptability with minimal processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of retraining the complete model in real-time, the system performs partial updates or uses the pre-trained model for direct predictions. This selective application of computational resources maintains adaptability while significantly reducing processing time and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If configuration parameters are frequently updated to optimize performance metrics, then network efficiency improves, but system stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork efficiencyVSAvoidconfiguration stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from performance metrics to determine when configuration changes are actually beneficial. By monitoring whether changes improve or degrade performance, the system can stabilize configurations when further changes would not provide benefit, thus maintaining stability while optimizing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates stabilization mechanisms that prevent excessive or erratic configuration changes. By preparing for potential instability through controlled update rates and validation checks, the system maintains configuration stability while still achieving network efficiency improvements through targeted optimizations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentEP3821498B1Controlling radiating elements
Publication Date: 2026.02.18 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • EP3821498B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3821498B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3821498B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

An apparatus, method and computer program product is disclosed. The apparatus may comprise means for receiving a performance metric for an antenna array comprised of a plurality of radiating elements, the performance metric being based on performance data associated with the antenna array, the antenna array having a radiating configuration represented by configuration parameters. The apparatus may also comprise means for updating the configuration parameters dependent on the received performance metric by means of estimating new configuration parameters for moving the performance metric towards a target value. The apparatus may also comprise means for re-configuring the radiating configuration of the antenna array based on the updated configuration parameters such that the physical geometry of the antenna array is changed.