Adaptive AR Image Processing With Dynamic Crop-and-Scale Ordering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing techniques for augmented reality (AR) devices are computationally expensive and may yield unsatisfactory results due to indiscriminate scaling or cropping of images, which can affect the accuracy of object tracking.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive image processing technique dynamically determines the crop-and-scale order based on object tracking parameters, such as historic tracking data and device motion, to generate optimized images for object tracking systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If indiscriminate scaling or cropping of images is performed, then image processing is simplified, but object tracking accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage processing complexityVSAvoidobject tracking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic determination of crop-and-scale order based on real-time object tracking parameters. The system switches between different processing orders (crop-then-scale vs. scale-then-crop) depending on current tracking conditions, making the image processing pipeline adaptive rather than static. This resolves the contradiction by allowing simplified processing when appropriate while maintaining accuracy when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the processing parameters (order of crop and scale operations) based on object tracking parameters such as historic tracking data and device motion. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system optimizes the balance between processing simplicity and tracking accuracy for different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If fixed crop-and-scale order is used, then image processing is faster, but adaptability to different tracking conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage processing speedVSAvoidadaptability to tracking conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the fixed crop-and-scale order into a dynamic decision process. The system evaluates current object tracking parameters and device motion state to determine the optimal processing order in real-time. This allows the system to maintain high processing speed for common scenarios while adapting to different tracking conditions when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the processing parameters based on tracked object characteristics and device motion. When objects are stable and tracking is reliable, the system uses faster fixed-order processing. When conditions change (e.g., rapid motion, new objects), the system switches to adaptive processing orders to maintain accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If crop-then-scale order is always used, then computational resources are reduced, but image quality for tracking deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational resourcesVSAvoidimage quality for tracking
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the processing parameters (crop-then-scale vs. scale-then-crop) based on object tracking parameters. When computational resources are abundant or tracking precision is critical, the system switches to scale-then-crop order which produces higher quality images. When resources are constrained and tracking is stable, crop-then-scale is used to save computational effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial processing (crop-then-scale) when sufficient for the current tracking task, and excessive processing (scale-then-crop) when higher quality is needed. This selective application of processing intensity resolves the contradiction between computational efficiency and image quality by matching the processing level to the actual tracking requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12462491B2Adaptive image processing for augmented reality device
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 SNAP INC
  • US12462491B2 patent drawing
  • US12462491B2 patent drawing
  • US12462491B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples describe adaptive image processing for an augmented reality (AR) device. An input image is captured by a camera of the AR device, and a region of interest of the input image is determined. The region of interest is associated with an object that is being tracked using an object tracking system. A crop-and-scale order of an image processing operation directed at the region of interest is determined for the input image. One or more object tracking parameters may be used to determine the crop-and-scale order. The crop-and-scale order is dynamically adjustable between a first order and a second order. An output image is generated from the input image by performing the image processing operation according to the determined crop-and-scale order for the particular input image. The output image can be accessed by the object tracking system to track the object.