Adaptive Audio Feedback Cancellation for Higher PA Loop Gain

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing audio feedback elimination systems in public address (PA) systems often require manual tuning and struggle to completely remove the feedback spectrum, leading to suboptimal performance and loudspeaker volume limitations due to correlated microphone and loudspeaker signals, which degrades the convergent properties of adaptive filters.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a dual-subband data structure with adaptive filters and a crossover frequency, along with transient and slow filter taps, and normalized non-linear echo suppression to systematically remove the entire feedback audio spectrum, allowing for higher loudspeaker volumes and easier setup without manual tuning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If manual tuning is used to eliminate audio feedback, then feedback can be reduced, but the system complexity increases and setup becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio feedbackVSAvoidmanual tuning requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The adaptive filter system automatically adjusts its parameters to eliminate audio feedback without requiring manual tuning. The system self-configures by continuously analyzing the feedback path and adapting filter coefficients, thereby resolving the contradiction between feedback elimination effectiveness and setup complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback signals to continuously optimize filter parameters and automatically adapt to changing acoustic conditions. This closed-loop approach eliminates the need for manual tuning while maintaining effective feedback suppression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If adaptive filters are used to eliminate feedback, then feedback reduction is achieved, but convergent performance degrades due to correlated microphone and loudspeaker signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback spectrumVSAvoidconvergent performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The audio signal is divided into multiple frequency bands using filter banks, allowing independent processing of different spectral regions. This segmentation enables the system to handle correlated signals more effectively by applying adaptive filtering selectively to specific frequency ranges where feedback occurs, thereby maintaining convergent performance while eliminating feedback

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different processing strategies are applied to different frequency bands based on local characteristics. The system identifies feedback-prone frequency regions and applies adaptive filtering specifically to those regions, while leaving other regions unchanged, thus preserving convergent performance in challenging correlated signal conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Power

If loudspeaker volume is increased to improve audio output, then audio quality improves, but audio feedback occurs more frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloudspeaker volumeVSAvoidfeedback occurrence
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the feedback signals themselves as input to train and optimize the adaptive filters. By converting the harmful feedback into useful training data, the system learns to predict and cancel feedback paths, enabling high loudspeaker volumes without actual feedback occurrence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS10455326B2Audio feedback reduction utilizing adaptive filters and nonlinear processing
Publication Date: 2019.10.22 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US10455326B2 patent drawing
  • US10455326B2 patent drawing
  • US10455326B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Traditional audio feedback elimination systems may attempt to reduce the effect of the audio feedback by simply scaling down the audio volume of the signal frequencies that are prone to howling. Other traditional feedback elimination systems may also employ adaptive notch filtering to detect and “notch” the so-called “singing” or “howling” frequencies as they occur in real-time. Such devices may typically have several knobs and buttons needing tuning, for example: the number of adaptive parametric equalizers (PEQs) versus fixed PEQs; attack and decay timers; and/or PEQ bandwidth. Rather than removing the singing frequencies with PEQs, the devices described herein attempt to holistically model the feedback audio and then remove the entire feedback signal. Two advantages of the devices described herein are: 1.) the system can operate at a much larger loop-gain (and hence with a much higher loudspeaker volume); and 2) setup is greatly simplified (i.e., no tuning knobs or buttons).