Adaptive Authentication Using Behavioral Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional multifactor authentication solutions for mobile devices are resource-intensive, degrade user experience, and do not dynamically adjust the number or types of authentication factors based on current device behavior, transaction types, or security risk levels.

Innovation Solution

The use of machine learning and behavioral analysis techniques to intelligently determine the number and types of authentication factors needed for secure user authentication, adapting to current device activities, user confidence levels, and security risk assessments without requiring excessive user interaction or resource consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional multifactor authentication solutions are implemented, then security is improved, but resource consumption and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system dynamically adjusts the number and type of authentication factors based on real-time behavioral analysis and risk assessment. Instead of always requiring multiple authentication factors, the system adapts the authentication level to match the current security risk, reducing resource consumption during low-risk operations while maintaining strong security during high-risk activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of authentication requirements based on analyzed device behavior patterns, user confidence levels, and security risk assessments. By modifying authentication parameters dynamically rather than using fixed requirements, the system optimizes the balance between security and resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional multifactor authentication solutions are implemented, then security is improved, but user experience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication process becomes dynamic and adaptive rather than static and rigid. The system adjusts authentication requirements in real-time based on behavioral analysis, allowing users to experience smooth, frictionless authentication during normal operations while maintaining strong security controls when risks are detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs continuous behavioral analysis and risk assessment automatically without requiring active user participation. The authentication process serves itself by continuously monitoring device behavior, user interactions, and security contexts, eliminating the need for users to manually adjust security settings or undergo repetitive authentication challenges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If conventional multifactor authentication solutions are implemented, then security is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidauthentication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system is segmented into independent modular components: behavioral analysis module, risk assessment module, and adaptive authentication module. Each component performs a specific function and can be developed, maintained, and optimized independently, reducing overall system complexity while enabling sophisticated adaptive authentication capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If continuous authentication is performed, then security is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous authenticationVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous heavy-computation authentication, the system uses periodic behavioral analysis and risk assessment that leverages existing device sensors and data. The adaptive authentication triggers computational-intensive verification only when risk thresholds are exceeded, rather than continuously, significantly reducing power consumption while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP3207680B1Method and device for using behavioral analysis towards efficient continuous authentication
Publication Date: 2025.04.09 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP3207680B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3207680B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3207680B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A computing device processor may be configured with processor-executable instructions to implement methods of using behavioral analysis and machine learning techniques to identify, prevent, correct, and/or otherwise respond to malicious or performance-degrading behaviors of the computing device. As part of these operations, the processor may perform multifactor authentication operations that include determining one or more of a transaction type criticality value, a user confidence value, a software integrity confidence value, and a historical behavior value, using the one or more of these values to determine a number of authentication factors that are be evaluated when authenticating a user of the computing device, and authenticating the user by evaluating the determined number of authentication factors.