Adaptive Authentication Context-Aware Security Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mobile device users face inconvenience due to repetitive authentication prompts, which can lead to security compliance issues as they often opt for lower security measures to avoid these prompts, even in situations where higher security is necessary.

Innovation Solution

Implementing adaptive authentication mechanisms that adjust authentication levels based on context, such as location, communication type, and ambient noise, allowing for varying levels of security depending on the situation, including the use of biometrics and password complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users use no or very limited security protection for their mobile devices, then convenience is improved, but security is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconvenienceVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system dynamically adjusts the required authentication level based on the detected environmental context. When the device is in a familiar location with low ambient noise, the system lowers authentication requirements or increases timeout duration. When in unfamiliar locations or high-noise environments, the system increases authentication stringency. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making security requirements flexible rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes authentication parameters (such as timeout duration, authentication level, or required factors) based on environmental conditions. By monitoring context parameters like location and ambient noise, the system adjusts security parameters to balance convenience and security needs in different situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If users are prompted for authentication many times per day, then security is improved, but convenience is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidconvenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication timeout is dynamically adjusted based on environmental context. In familiar, low-risk environments, the timeout period is extended, reducing the frequency of authentication prompts. In unfamiliar or high-risk environments, the timeout is shortened or authentication is required immediately. This dynamic timing adjustment reduces unnecessary authentication interruptions while maintaining security when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors environmental feedback (location, ambient noise, device usage patterns) and adjusts authentication behavior accordingly. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from environmental conditions and optimize authentication timing to minimize user disruption while maintaining appropriate security levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If users opt for lower security measures to avoid repetitive authentication prompts, then convenience is improved, but security compliance is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconvenienceVSAvoidsecurity compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines the appropriate authentication level based on environmental context without requiring user intervention or configuration. Users do not need to manually adjust security settings or choose between convenience and security options. The system self-adjusts authentication requirements based on the detected environment, eliminating the need for users to compromise security for convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

By making authentication requirements dynamic rather than static, the system adapts to contextual risks automatically. This eliminates the need for users to choose fixed security levels, allowing the system to provide high security when contextual risks are high and lower security when risks are low, thereby maintaining security compliance without sacrificing convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If adaptive authentication mechanisms are implemented, then security compliance is improved, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity complianceVSAvoidauthentication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical or manual authentication systems with sensor-based environmental monitoring. Instead of requiring users to manually assess risk and adjust security settings, the system uses sensors (microphone for ambient noise, GPS for location) to automatically detect contextual factors and adjust authentication requirements. This substitution of physical/sensory detection for manual complexity reduces the perceived system complexity while maintaining adaptive security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10666635B2Adaptive authentication systems and methods
Publication Date: 2020.05.26 INTEL CORP
  • US10666635B2 patent drawing
  • US10666635B2 patent drawing
  • US10666635B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment includes a method executed by at least one processor comprising: determining a first environmental factor for a mobile communications device; determining a first security authentication level based on the determined first environmental factor; and allowing access to a first module of the mobile communications device based on the first security authentication level. Other embodiments are described herein.