Adaptive Base Station Cooperation for Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional non-cooperative cellular networks face interference limitations due to overlapping cells, which restrict spectral efficiency, and existing cooperative schemes require significant overhead for effective signal exchange.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive method for base station cooperation in wireless networks, using orthogonal frequency division multiplexing, determines pre-coding matrices for full, semi, and non-cooperation modes based on sum rate thresholds, optimizing spectral efficiency by selecting the appropriate cooperation level and minimizing interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If base stations cooperate by concurrently transmitting signals for different mobile stations, then spectral efficiency is improved, but additional overhead is required for information exchange

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidoverhead for information exchange
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial cooperation by allowing base stations to cooperate only when channel conditions are favorable (when channel state information indicates good conditions). This means cooperation is not always performed, but only partially when beneficial, thus achieving spectral efficiency improvement without the continuous overhead of full cooperation schemes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the cooperation parameter (whether to cooperate or not) based on channel state information. By monitoring channel conditions and adjusting the cooperation decision accordingly, the system optimizes the trade-off between spectral efficiency gains and overhead requirements, implementing adaptive cooperation rather than fixed cooperation modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If base stations use non-cooperative schemes with frequency band re-use, then interference is reduced, but spectral efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintercell co-channel interferenceVSAvoidspectral efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic base station cooperation where the cooperation behavior changes based on real-time channel conditions. When channel state information indicates favorable conditions, base stations dynamically switch to cooperative transmission to improve spectral efficiency. When conditions are poor, they revert to non-cooperative modes to minimize interference, thus dynamically adapting to balance interference reduction and spectral efficiency improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses channel state information as feedback to determine whether base stations should cooperate. The channel conditions provide feedback about the current interference environment and signal quality, which the base stations use to make informed decisions about whether to engage in cooperative transmission, thereby adaptively managing the interference-efficiency trade-off.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2206249B1Method for transmitting signals in multi-user communications network
Publication Date: 2011.05.25 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • EP2206249B1 patent drawing
  • EP2206249B1 patent drawing
  • EP2206249B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The embodiments of the invention provide an adaptive method for base station cooperation in a wireless network. In a multi-user communications network that includes base stations, and in which each base station is associated with a cell, and in which each cell includes one or more mobile stations, each base station determines pre-coding matrices for full-cooperation, semi-cooperation and non-cooperation. Each base stations also determines a sum rate SR full for full-cooperation, a sum rateSR semi for semi-cooperation, and a sum rate SR non for non-cooperation. Then, each base station selects the pre-coding for full-cooperation, the pre-coding matrices for semi cooperation, or the pre-coding matrices for non cooperation. Each base station transmits signals according to the selected per-coding matrices.