Adaptive Battery Charging Alerts for Predicted Usage Sessions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional static battery charging notifications fail to account for varying user behaviors and device usage patterns, leading to inadequate reminders for recharging, which can result in device failure during critical usage sessions.

Innovation Solution

Adaptive battery charging notifications that consider user habits, device usage patterns, application characteristics, and battery characteristics to tailor notification timing, using machine learning and rules-based algorithms to predict future usage sessions and select optimal notification windows.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If static battery charging notifications are used, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to unexpected device failures during usage sessions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery charging reliabilityVSAvoidbattery management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future usage sessions before they occur and triggering charging notifications in advance. The processor analyzes historical usage data to forecast when the device will be used next and sends notifications early enough to ensure the battery is recharged before the predicted usage session begins, preventing unexpected failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring actual usage sessions and comparing them with predicted usage patterns. Historical usage data is collected and fed back into the prediction algorithm to improve future predictions. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enhances charging reliability by adapting to actual user behavior while maintaining manageable system complexity through iterative learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If adaptive battery charging notifications are implemented, then reliability is improved by preventing failures, but device complexity increases due to usage pattern analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery charging reliabilityVSAvoidusage pattern analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies self-service by automatically analyzing usage patterns and making charging predictions without requiring user intervention. The processor independently processes historical usage data, identifies usage sessions, predicts future sessions, and triggers notifications autonomously. This self-service approach improves reliability while keeping the user interface simple and the perceived complexity low for the end user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by creating simplified models of usage patterns from historical data. Instead of directly implementing complex analysis of all possible usage scenarios, the system copies and replicates observed usage behaviors to generate predictive models. This allows the system to handle complexity internally through data replication and pattern matching while maintaining a simple external interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If charging notifications are triggered earlier, then reliability is improved by ensuring battery is recharged, but loss of time increases due to earlier interruption of usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery charging reliabilityVSAvoidnotification timing loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making notification timing flexible and adaptive rather than static. The charging notification trigger time dynamically adjusts based on predicted usage session duration, battery charge level, and historical charging behavior. This dynamic approach allows the system to trigger notifications at optimally timed moments that balance reliability improvement with minimal time loss, adapting to each specific situation rather than using fixed timing rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements parameter changes by varying notification timing parameters based on multiple factors including battery charge rate, predicted usage duration, and historical patterns. Instead of using a fixed time advance for all notifications, the system changes the notification trigger parameter dynamically based on the specific state and context, optimizing the balance between ensuring adequate charging time and minimizing disruption to user workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12609549B2Adaptive battery management
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US12609549B2 patent drawing
  • US12609549B2 patent drawing
  • US12609549B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This document generally relates to techniques for adaptively triggering charging notifications for a battery-powered user device. One example includes a method or technique that can be performed on a computing device. The method or technique can include obtaining a battery charge level of a battery of a battery-powered user device and accessing user data for a user of the battery-powered user device. The user data can reflect previous usage sessions of the user with the battery-powered user device. The method or technique can also include predicting a future usage session of the user with the battery-powered user device based on the user data. The method or technique can also include estimating confidence that the battery will last through the future usage session based on the battery charge level and the predicted future usage session. The method or technique can also include triggering a charging notification prior to the future usage session based on the estimated confidence.