Adaptive Beamforming Antenna Subarray Controller

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face inefficiencies in assigning communication channels to multiple devices, particularly in mmWave frequency bands, as the Hungarian method's polynomial time complexity becomes inadequate for real-time communications as the number of devices increases.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a greedy optimization with an adaptable relaxation parameter to balance optimality and computational complexity, allowing for varying performance metrics across different communication applications, and considering only possible assignments at each stage to reduce complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the Hungarian method is used for channel assignment, then the assignment optimality is improved, but the computational complexity increases significantly as the number of devices increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassignment optimalityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the optimization method adaptable rather than fixed. The system dynamically selects between different optimization approaches (Hungarian method for small numbers of devices, greedy algorithm for large numbers) based on the current system state, specifically the number of wireless devices. This allows the system to maintain high optimality when possible while avoiding excessive computational complexity when the number of devices grows large.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of optimization method based on system conditions. By monitoring the number of wireless devices and switching between the Hungarian method and greedy algorithm based on this parameter threshold, the system adjusts its computational approach to match the current system scale, thereby maintaining appropriate balance between optimality and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the number of wireless devices increases, then the system capacity is improved, but the assignment computation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidassignment computation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts its computation method based on the number of devices. When the number of devices exceeds a threshold, it switches from the computationally intensive Hungarian method to the faster greedy algorithm, thereby maintaining system capacity growth while preventing computation time from becoming excessive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using the greedy algorithm that provides sufficient (though not optimal) assignment solutions for large-scale systems. This partial optimization approach accepts that absolute optimality is not achieved but provides adequately good solutions with much lower computational cost, which is acceptable for large-scale wireless systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of manufacture

If a fixed optimization method is used, then the implementation simplicity is improved, but the adaptability to different system sizes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to system size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements adaptability by creating a dynamic selection mechanism that automatically adjusts the optimization method based on the number of wireless devices. The system monitors system size and switches between Hungarian method and greedy algorithm accordingly, thereby maintaining simplicity in each regime while achieving versatility across different system scales.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves universality by creating a single system that can handle both small and large numbers of wireless devices effectively. Through the multi-functional design that incorporates both Hungarian method and greedy algorithm with automatic selection, the system becomes universally applicable across different system sizes without requiring separate implementations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10355762B2System and method for adaptive beamforming communication
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES INC
  • US10355762B2 patent drawing
  • US10355762B2 patent drawing
  • US10355762B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless communication system includes a controller to control a plurality of antenna subarrays of a first wireless communication device to form a plurality of directional beams to communicate a beamformed diversity wireless transmission between the first wireless communication device and a set of second wireless communication devices over a plurality of communication channels. The controller assigns at least some antenna subarrays to at least some second wireless communication devices using a greedy optimization with a relaxation parameter and controls the plurality of antenna subarrays according to the assignment.