Adaptive Brain Stimulation System for Cognitive Enhancement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for improving cognitive function through non-invasive brain stimulation, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have inconsistent outcomes and are highly dependent on methodological parameters, particularly when used in multisession designs for treating cognitive impairments like Alzheimer's and acquired brain injury.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that assesses baseline cognitive function, provides a strategy for cognitive training, and adjusts non-invasive transcranial stimulation based on real-time EEG monitoring to optimize brain stimulation and training protocols, using a combination of cognitive function tests and adaptive computer-implemented training to improve cognitive performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If non-invasive brain stimulation is applied during cognitive training, then cognitive function improvement is enhanced, but outcome consistency deteriorates due to dependence on methodological parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutcome consistencyVSAvoiddependence on methodological parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts stimulation parameters (intensity, duration, electrode positioning) based on real-time EEG monitoring of cortical excitability and cognitive task performance. This dynamic adaptation allows the protocol to optimize for each subject's neural state, reducing dependence on fixed methodological parameters and improving outcome consistency across diverse populations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention systematically varies multiple parameters including stimulation intensity, pulse duration, electrode configuration, and timing relative to cognitive tasks. By optimizing these parameters based on individual baseline assessment and real-time monitoring, the system achieves reliable cognitive improvement without being overly dependent on any single methodological parameter

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If standardized cognitive training protocols are used, then ease of implementation is improved, but effectiveness deteriorates due to lack of individualization

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveeffectivenessVSAvoidindividualization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically monitoring EEG signals and cognitive performance metrics, then autonomously optimizing stimulation parameters without requiring manual intervention from therapists. This self-service capability enables individualization of treatment protocols while maintaining ease of operation, as the system adapts to each subject's needs without increasing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time EEG monitoring provides continuous feedback on cortical excitability and task performance, which is fed back into the control system to adjust stimulation parameters. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables effective individualization of treatment while keeping the system easy to operate, as the automation handles the complexity of personalization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The approach significantly enhances cognitive function by providing personalized and adaptive stimulation and training strategies, particularly benefiting individuals with low working memory capacity, leading to improved performance in cognitive tasks and sustained benefits post-stimulation.

Implementation Method 1

transcranial direct current brain stimulation (tDCS). It has been suggested that tDCS may improve a variety of cognitive functions by exploiting mechanisms of synaptic long-term potentiation and depression

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

Monitoring the subject's cognitive performance may comprise obtaining and processing an EEG

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroencephalography (EEG): Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS20240091531A1Improving cognitive function
Publication Date: 2024.03.21 DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
  • US20240091531A1 patent drawing
  • US20240091531A1 patent drawing
  • US20240091531A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for improving cognitive function is disclosed. The system comprises a non-invasive brain stimulation device (150); a human computer interface; and a computer (101) configured to control the non-invasive brain stimulation device (150) and the human computer interface. The computer (101) controls the brain stimulation device (150) and the human computer interface to assess a subject's baseline cognitive function by interaction with the subject using the human computer interface. If the subject's baseline cognitive function is impaired, the computer (101) uses the human computer interface to provide the subject with a strategy for improving performance in a cognitive function test and stimulates the subjects brain with the non-invasive brain stimulation device (150) while training the subjects cognitive function.