Adaptive Brain Training System Using Biofeedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current meditation technologies lack objective measures to assess performance relative to meditation goals, as they do not incorporate brain activity features, limiting their effectiveness in guiding users towards desired brain states.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a computing device with a processor and bio-signal sensors that execute brain state guidance routines, analyze brainwave data, and provide real-time feedback to users on their performance relative to meditation objectives, allowing for adaptive adjustments in the meditation experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If meditation technologies use bio-signal monitoring, then objective measurement capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobjective measurement of meditation performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computing device performs multiple functions: executing brain state guidance routines, analyzing bio-signal data, providing real-time feedback, and adapting the meditation experience. This multi-functionality consolidates what could be separate complex systems into a single integrated platform, improving measurement capability while managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors bio-signal data and provides real-time feedback to guide users toward desired brain states. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables objective measurement of meditation performance without requiring complex manual assessment protocols, as the system automatically processes bio-signal data and adjusts guidance accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system provides real-time feedback based on brain activity analysis, then meditation guidance effectiveness is improved, but processing requirements and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeditation guidance effectivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system analyzes brain activity data continuously but provides feedback selectively based on detected brain state changes or predefined thresholds. This partial action approach processes data at full capacity only when necessary, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining guidance effectiveness during critical moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system periodically assesses brain activity data against target brain states and provides feedback at intervals rather than continuously. This periodic processing reduces energy consumption compared to constant real-time analysis, while still maintaining reliable guidance by checking and adjusting at regular intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system adapts meditation routines based on measured performance, then user personalization and effectiveness are improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptive meditation guidanceVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts meditation routines based on real-time brain state measurements and performance data. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to respond flexibly to user needs without requiring pre-computed complex algorithms, as adjustments are made on-the-fly based on current brain activity patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-establishes multiple meditation routines with different characteristics and difficulty levels. When adapting to user performance, it selects from these pre-prepared options rather than generating entirely new routines computationally. This preliminary preparation reduces real-time computational complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20150351655A1Adaptive brain training computer system and method
Publication Date: 2015.12.10 INTERAXON
  • US20150351655A1 patent drawing
  • US20150351655A1 patent drawing
  • US20150351655A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system for guiding one or more users through a brain state guidance exercise or routine, such as a meditation exercise, is provided. The computer system includes at least one computing device which may be a smart phone. A computer program which may be a mobile application runs one or more brain state guidance routines that guide at least one user through at least one brain state guidance exercise. The computing device is connected to at least one bio-signal sensor that provides biofeedback information to the computing device, and where the computer program when executed further measures performance of the at least one user relative to one or more brain state guidance related objectives by analyzing the biofeedback information based on stability of state of mind for the user. The computer program may recognize, score and reward states of meditation.