Adaptive External Medical Device Interface for Cardiac Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing external medical devices for monitoring and treating cardiac conditions often require patients to have a certain level of technological comfort and understanding, which can vary significantly among individuals, leading to challenges in operation and effectiveness due to differences in physical and mental capabilities.

Innovation Solution

An external medical device equipped with monitoring circuitry and a controller that adapts its interaction mode based on patient input and user input, adjusting features such as textual, image, or video elements, audio, and tactile outputs to match the patient's comfort level and ability, thereby personalizing the user interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the medical device uses a standardized user interface, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ease of operation deteriorates for patients with varying technological comfort levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The user interface dynamically adapts its characteristics based on patient ability assessments. The system transitions from a static standardized interface to a dynamic one that adjusts complexity, terminology, and interaction modes according to real-time patient capability evaluations, resolving the contradiction between operational ease and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes interface parameters such as terminology complexity, visual elements, and interaction requirements based on patient ability levels. By modifying these parameters dynamically, the system maintains ease of operation across different patient populations without requiring multiple specialized interfaces, thus managing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If the device provides detailed technical information, then the information completeness is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates for patients with limited technological understanding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring the level of technical detail to specific patient needs. Different portions of the interface provide different levels of information density based on the patient's assessed ability, ensuring information completeness is delivered at an appropriate level without overwhelming the patient

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from patient interactions and ability assessments to adjust the level of technical information provided. This feedback loop ensures that information completeness is maintained while adapting to the patient's technological understanding level, preventing information overload

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the device uses simplified interface elements, then the ease of operation is improved, but the information completeness deteriorates for patients with higher technological comfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidinformation completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The interface dynamically adjusts between simplified and detailed information based on patient ability assessments. For patients with higher technological comfort, the system provides more comprehensive information while maintaining ease of operation through intuitive design, avoiding the loss of information for any patient group

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If the device adapts to individual patient abilities, then the ease of operation is improved, but the device complexity increases due to adaptive algorithms and multiple interaction modes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically assessing patient abilities and configuring the interface without requiring manual intervention. This automation reduces the operational burden on both patients and providers while managing device complexity through algorithmic decision-making rather than complex manual configuration systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250000391A1Device Administered Tests and Adaptive Interactions
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION
  • US20250000391A1 patent drawing
  • US20250000391A1 patent drawing
  • US20250000391A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An external medical device includes monitoring circuitry configured to monitor a cardiac condition of a patient using the external medical device; and a controller configured to: receive at least one of patient input and non-patient user input of a patient's ability; determine a patient interaction mode of the external medical device based on the at least one of the patient input and the non-patient user input; and adapt the patient interaction mode of the external medical device over time based on the at least one of the patient input and the non-patient user input.