Adaptive Cell Measurement for Wireless Terminals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cell measurement methods in wireless communication systems fail to meet the diverse measurement demands of terminal devices with different traffic types, as they rely on fixed measurement parameters that do not adapt to varying traffic conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method where terminal devices and network devices determine specific information such as traffic type, QoS, and device information to adjust measurement parameters like hysteresis, threshold, and report time intervals, enabling flexible measurement operations tailored to individual device conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If fixed measurement parameters are used for all terminal devices, then the measurement process is simple and uniform, but the measurement accuracy and efficiency cannot meet diverse traffic requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement parameter complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of measurement parameters (filtering coefficient, report time interval, threshold) based on real-time traffic conditions. The terminal device monitors traffic characteristics and dynamically modifies measurement parameters to match current traffic demands, transforming the static measurement process into an adaptive dynamic system that optimizes accuracy for varying traffic types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes measurement parameters according to traffic conditions by introducing traffic type identification and corresponding parameter adjustment rules. Different traffic types (e.g., voice, data, emergency) trigger different parameter sets, allowing the system to optimize measurement accuracy for each traffic category while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized adjustment rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If measurement parameters are optimized for specific traffic types, then measurement efficiency improves for those traffic types, but the system becomes complex to manage multiple parameter sets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement efficiencyVSAvoidparameter management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by tailoring measurement parameters to specific traffic types and terminal device conditions. Instead of using uniform parameters globally, the system selectively adjusts parameters (filtering coefficient, report interval, threshold) based on local traffic characteristics and device capabilities, optimizing measurement efficiency for each specific context while maintaining overall system manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the terminal device monitors its own traffic conditions and measurement performance, then adjusts parameters accordingly. The network device also provides feedback through configuration messages, creating a closed-loop system that continuously optimizes measurement efficiency without requiring manual management of multiple parameter sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If filtering time is shortened to reduce delay, then responsiveness improves, but measurement accuracy may deteriorate due to insufficient sampling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement delayVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the filtering coefficient (alpha parameter) based on traffic conditions and delay requirements. For delay-sensitive traffic, the system uses smaller filtering coefficients to reduce filtering time and improve responsiveness. For accuracy-critical scenarios, larger coefficients provide smoother measurements. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by allowing optimal filtering time for each specific situation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the filtering time dynamic rather than fixed, allowing the system to adapt the sampling and filtering rate according to current traffic conditions and delay tolerances. This dynamic adjustment enables the system to achieve both short delay and adequate accuracy by optimizing the filtering process in real-time based on actual measurement needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11115851B2Cell measurement method, terminal device and network device
Publication Date: 2021.09.07 GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP LTD
  • US11115851B2 patent drawing
  • US11115851B2 patent drawing
  • US11115851B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cell measurement method, a terminal device and a network device are provided. The method includes: a terminal device determines specific information of the terminal device, wherein the specific information includes at least one of: traffic information of the terminal device, priority information of the terminal device, and device information of the terminal device; the terminal device adjusts a measurement parameter in a cell measurement process according to the specific information; and the terminal device performs a measurement operation according to the measurement parameter.