Adaptive Channel Filtering for Common-Mode Interference Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing physiological measurement devices struggle with common-mode interference due to slight differences in transfer functions among electrodes, which cannot be fully mitigated by existing methods, leading to noisy and inaccurate measurements.

Innovation Solution

Adapting the digital filter coefficients of each channel based on the characteristics of the vector signal, rather than focusing on channel-specific characteristics, to effectively mitigate common-mode interference, allowing for cost-efficient signal acquisition without requiring additional calibration or RLD techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional common-mode rejection methods (impedance matching, RLD technique) are used, then some interference mitigation is achieved, but common-mode interference cannot be fully cancelled due to transfer function differences between channels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommon-mode interferenceVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the coefficients of digital filters in each channel based on the characteristics of the vector signal. Instead of using fixed filter parameters or relying on impedance matching, the system continuously adapts the filter coefficients to optimize common-mode rejection. This allows the system to compensate for transfer function differences between channels and achieve superior interference mitigation while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If additional calibration techniques or RLD circuits are implemented to improve common-mode rejection, then interference mitigation improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommon-mode interferenceVSAvoidsignal acquisition front-end complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex hardware-based common-mode rejection techniques (such as RLD circuits and impedance matching networks) with a software-based adaptive filtering approach. By using digital signal processing and adaptive coefficient adjustment, the system achieves effective interference mitigation without requiring additional analog circuitry or complex calibration hardware, thereby reducing device complexity and cost while maintaining or improving performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4308001B1Physiological measurement device comprising adaptive filters and method
Publication Date: 2025.11.19 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP4308001B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4308001B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4308001B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a physiological measurement device (11) comprising a plurality of input channels (23), at least two of the input channels including a digital section configured to process a digital signal (d1, d2) representing an analog signal (e1, e2) present at an electrode (13) assigned to the respective channel, a signal combiner (31) configured to calculate at least one vector signal (x) from at least two processed digital signals (df1, df2). To achieve improved common-mode interference mitigation, it is proposed that the digital section of at least one input channel (23) comprise a digital filter (29) configured to filter the digital signal (d1, d2) based on a set of filter coefficients (G1, G2) and a processor (33) configured for calculating the set of filter coefficients (G1, G2) based on the vector signal (x1).