Adaptive Channel Sounding for Wireless Access Points

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional channel sounding strategies are inefficient in both static and dynamic scenarios, as they fail to adapt to environment changes and client behaviors, leading to high overhead and packet error rates due to outdated steer matrices.

Innovation Solution

Implementing adaptive channel sounding by enabling or disabling beamforming and adjusting channel sounding intervals based on the channel state information (CSI) change rate, with different time intervals for varying CSI conditions, and even disabling beamforming in extremely dynamic scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional channel sounding is performed at fixed intervals, then beamforming can be maintained, but overhead increases and packet error rates increase in dynamic scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeamforming reliabilityVSAvoidchannel sounding overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic channel sounding intervals that adapt to channel conditions. When channel state information (CSI) changes rapidly, the system decreases the sounding interval to maintain beamforming accuracy. When CSI is stable, the system increases the interval to reduce overhead. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between maintaining reliability and reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of channel sounding interval based on CSI variation. By monitoring CSI and adjusting the sounding interval parameter dynamically, the system optimizes the balance between beamforming reliability and overhead reduction, avoiding fixed interval limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If channel sounding is performed frequently to maintain accuracy in dynamic environments, then beamforming performance improves, but overhead and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeamforming accuracyVSAvoidnetwork efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts channel sounding frequency based on real-time CSI conditions. In highly dynamic environments, frequent sounding maintains accuracy. In static environments, reduced sounding frequency improves network efficiency. This dynamic behavior resolves the contradiction between reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses CSI feedback to determine appropriate channel sounding intervals. By continuously monitoring channel conditions and adjusting sounding frequency based on this feedback, the system achieves optimal balance between beamforming accuracy and network efficiency without excessive overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If channel sounding interval is extended to reduce overhead, then resource consumption decreases, but steer matrices become outdated in dynamic scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel sounding resource consumptionVSAvoidsteer matrix accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the channel sounding interval parameter based on CSI stability. When CSI varies slowly, extended intervals reduce resource consumption while maintaining accuracy. When CSI changes rapidly, the system shortens the interval to prevent steer matrix obsolescence, resolving the contradiction between energy loss and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If adaptive channel sounding is implemented to reduce overhead in static scenarios, then network efficiency improves, but complexity of channel management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork efficiencyVSAvoidchannel management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements adaptive channel sounding using CSI feedback mechanisms. By monitoring channel conditions and automatically adjusting sounding intervals, the system improves network efficiency in static scenarios while managing complexity through standardized feedback loops and decision algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11706008B2Adaptive channel sounding
Publication Date: 2023.07.18 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US11706008B2 patent drawing
  • US11706008B2 patent drawing
  • US11706008B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided an approach for channel sounding. According to embodiments of the present disclosure, if the CSI change rate exceeds a first threshold, the AP may disable the beamforming. If the CSI change rate does not exceed the first threshold but exceeds a second threshold below the first threshold, the AP may perform the channel sounding at a first time interval. Otherwise, if the CSI change rate does not exceed the second threshold, the AP may perform the channel sounding at a second time interval. Embodiments of the present disclosure provide an effective way for channel sounding.