Adaptive Compensator for Plant Control Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems for plants, such as electrical and mechanical systems, face challenges in accurately modeling and controlling systems with varying loads and conditions, leading to issues like overshoot and oscillation, especially in real-time operations without disrupting system performance.

Innovation Solution

The design of an adaptive compensator that determines plant characteristics, such as impulse response, in real-time or during manufacturing, allowing for the computation of compensator coefficients to adjust to changing conditions, ensuring stable operation and eliminating overshoot and oscillation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional control systems are used for plants with varying loads and conditions, then the system structure is simple, but the control accuracy deteriorates leading to overshoot and oscillation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adapts to varying plant characteristics by continuously determining impulse response and computing updated compensator coefficients in real-time, transforming a static control structure into a dynamic one that adjusts to changing loads and conditions while maintaining control accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from actual plant output to determine impulse response characteristics and compute compensator coefficients, creating a closed-loop adaptive control mechanism that eliminates overshoot and oscillation by continuously adjusting to plant variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If real-time adaptive compensator computation is implemented, then the adaptability to changing conditions is improved, but the computational complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to changing conditionsVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs self-characterization by determining its own impulse response and automatically computing its own compensator coefficients without external intervention, enabling real-time adaptation while managing computational burden through autonomous operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-computes compensator coefficients based on determined impulse response characteristics before actual control operation, allowing real-time adaptation without excessive computational burden during critical control moments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If the compensator is permanently set before deployment, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to varying system loads and conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompensator configurationVSAvoidresponse to varying loads
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The compensator transitions from a static, permanently-set configuration to a dynamic structure that automatically adjusts its coefficients based on real-time determination of plant impulse response, enabling adaptation to varying loads and conditions without increasing physical device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If in-situ characterization is performed during system operation, then the measurement accuracy of plant characteristics is improved, but the system operation is disturbed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplant characteristic accuracyVSAvoidsystem operation continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs in-situ characterization during normal operation without interrupting or disturbing the useful action of the plant, continuously determining impulse response and updating compensator coefficients while the system remains operational, ensuring both measurement accuracy and operational continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS10520916B1Control systems
Publication Date: 2019.12.31 RICHARD A GROS & ASSOC INC
  • US10520916B1 patent drawing
  • US10520916B1 patent drawing
  • US10520916B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for designing a compensator for controlling a plant and to control systems for such plants. In one embodiment, a compensator may be designed by introducing a predetermined input into the plant; measuring an impulse response of the plant responding to the predetermined input; determining a mathematical model for the plant based at least in part on the impulse response of the plant, the model comprising a first ratio of polynomials (the plant model) including a first set of coefficients; and determining a second ratio of polynomials including a second set of coefficients (the compensator) based at least in part on the first set of coefficients to operate the compensator such that the compensator produces a series of plant inputs to move the plant towards a setpoint according to a predetermined plant output.